PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNA vs. TECL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNA vs. TECL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNA achieves a 61.66% return, which is significantly lower than TECL's 74.81% return. Over the past 10 years, TNA has underperformed TECL with an annualized return of 7.28%, while TECL has yielded a comparatively higher 47.53% annualized return.


TNA

1D
-1.96%
1M
-0.47%
6M
38.80%
YTD
61.66%
1Y
109.48%
3Y*
24.92%
5Y*
-3.00%
10Y*
7.28%
ALL TIME*
14.85%

TECL

1D
-1.63%
1M
0.04%
6M
102.11%
YTD
74.81%
1Y
117.98%
3Y*
63.34%
5Y*
28.39%
10Y*
47.53%
ALL TIME*
47.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$163.14M$152.38M$225.17M
$307.88M$302.10M$403.34M

TNA vs. TECL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
61.66%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%39.15%
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
74.81%38.60%36.15%203.14%-74.32%112.80%69.46%185.58%-24.03%124.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TNA and TECL is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2008

0.72

The correlation between TNA and TECL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

TNA vs. TECL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TNA
TECL

Healthcare

20.3%

-

Financial Services

17.5%

-

Technology

14.8%
99.2%

Industrials

14.2%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%

-

Real Estate

6.6%

-

Energy

5.5%
0.0%

Basic Materials

4.4%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.6%

-

Communication Services

2.2%
0.8%

Healthcare

TNA
20.3%
TECL

-

Financial Services

TNA
17.5%
TECL

-

Technology

TNA
14.8%
TECL
99.2%

Industrials

TNA
14.2%
TECL
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

TNA
9.2%
TECL

-

Real Estate

TNA
6.6%
TECL

-

Energy

TNA
5.5%
TECL
0.0%

Basic Materials

TNA
4.4%
TECL

-

Utilities

TNA
2.7%
TECL

-

Consumer Defensive

TNA
2.6%
TECL

-

Communication Services

TNA
2.2%
TECL
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNA vs. TECL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

TECL
TECL Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TECL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TECL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECL Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TNA vs. TECL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TNATECLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.26

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

2.55

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.11

6.00

+5.11

TNA vs. TECL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNA Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the TECL Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNA and TECL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TNA vs. TECL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNA drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, which is greater than TECL's maximum drawdown of -77.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNA and TECL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNATECLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.09%

-77.96%

-10.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.53%

-46.58%

+14.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.78%

-66.58%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.36%

-77.96%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.09%

-77.96%

-10.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.63%

-24.92%

-6.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.92%

-18.45%

-15.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.89%

19.75%

-9.86%

Volatility

TNA vs. TECL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) is 13.46%, while Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) has a volatility of 29.61%. This indicates that TNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TECL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNATECLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.46%

29.61%

-16.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.43%

66.17%

-23.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.54%

77.25%

-19.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.23%

76.96%

-9.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.38%

73.74%

-5.36%

TNA vs. TECL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNA has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than TECL's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

TNA vs. TECL - Dividend Comparison

TNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than TECL's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
4.07%7.19%0.29%0.28%0.22%0.32%0.52%0.25%0.47%0.10%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.29%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


TNA and TECL have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TECL has higher volatility (29.61%) compared to TNA (13.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNA dropped -88.09% vs TECL's -77.96%.

On 10-year performance, TECL leads with 47.53% vs 7.28% for TNA. On fees, TECL is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, TNA has been the lower-risk option at 13.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TECL has performed better with a 47.53% return vs 7.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TECL is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.

TECL has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 0.29% for TNA.

TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily), while TECL tracks Technology Select Sector Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TNA and 0.91% for TECL.

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNA and TECL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer