TNA vs. NFLT
TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) and NFLT (Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TNA is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (300%), while NFLT is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Virtus. TNA is passively managed, while NFLT is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, TNA returned 8.78%/yr vs 4.09%/yr for NFLT. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TNA charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for NFLT.
Performance
TNA vs. NFLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNA achieves a 53.14% return, which is significantly higher than NFLT's 1.75% return. Over the past 10 years, TNA has outperformed NFLT with an annualized return of 8.78%, while NFLT has yielded a comparatively lower 4.09% annualized return.
TNA
- 1D
- 2.53%
- 1M
- 8.84%
- YTD
- 53.14%
- 6M
- 40.13%
- 1Y
- 117.40%
- 3Y*
- 25.74%
- 5Y*
- -6.50%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
NFLT
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 7.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.50%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- 4.09%
TNA vs. NFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 53.14% | 9.82% | 7.21% | 26.24% | -62.48% | 27.88% | -7.82% | 71.88% | -39.89% | 39.15% |
NFLT Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 1.75% | 8.77% | 6.05% | 9.16% | -9.49% | 1.18% | 8.02% | 10.13% | -2.68% | 6.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between TNA and NFLT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2015 | 0.19 |
The correlation between TNA and NFLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TNA vs. NFLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TNA
NFLT
Industrials
-
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
TNA
NFLT
-
Technology
TNA
NFLT
Healthcare
TNA
NFLT
Financial Services
TNA
NFLT
Consumer Cyclical
TNA
NFLT
-
Real Estate
TNA
NFLT
Energy
TNA
NFLT
-
Basic Materials
TNA
NFLT
-
Utilities
TNA
NFLT
Communication Services
TNA
NFLT
-
Consumer Defensive
TNA
NFLT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TNA vs. NFLT — Risk / Return Rank
TNA
NFLT
TNA vs. NFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TNA | NFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 3.26 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.92 | 14.29 | -2.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TNA vs. NFLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNA drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, which is greater than NFLT's maximum drawdown of -15.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNA and NFLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNA | NFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.09% | -15.17% | -72.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.53% | -2.42% | -30.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.78% | -3.24% | -62.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.36% | -13.42% | -68.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.09% | -15.17% | -72.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.23% | -0.65% | -34.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.92% | -2.10% | -31.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.91% | 0.55% | +9.36% |
Volatility
TNA vs. NFLT - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a higher volatility of 21.54% compared to Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) at 1.64%. This indicates that TNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TNA | NFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.54% | 1.64% | +19.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.61% | 3.12% | +39.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.70% | 4.20% | +54.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.57% | 4.47% | +63.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.54% | 4.95% | +63.59% |
TNA vs. NFLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNA has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than NFLT's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TNA vs. NFLT - Dividend Comparison
TNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than NFLT's 5.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLT Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 5.48% | 5.74% | 5.76% | 6.02% | 4.16% | 3.41% | 3.63% | 4.33% | 4.81% | 6.23% | 5.30% | 0.67% |
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 0.39% | 0.78% | 0.93% | 1.27% | 0.31% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.44% | 0.36% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TNA and NFLT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TNA has higher volatility (21.54%) compared to NFLT (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNA dropped -88.09% vs NFLT's -15.17%.
On 10-year performance, TNA leads with 8.78% vs 4.09% for NFLT. On fees, NFLT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, NFLT has been the lower-risk option at 1.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TNA has performed better with a 8.78% return vs 4.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NFLT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for TNA.
NFLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.48%, compared with 0.39% for TNA.
TNA is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NFLT is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for TNA and 0.50% for NFLT.
TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TNA and NFLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer