PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNA vs. KORU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNA vs. KORU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNA achieves a 53.14% return, which is significantly lower than KORU's 478.17% return. Over the past 10 years, TNA has underperformed KORU with an annualized return of 7.99%, while KORU has yielded a comparatively higher 17.48% annualized return.


TNA

1D
4.51%
1M
8.55%
YTD
53.14%
6M
43.09%
1Y
130.31%
3Y*
31.74%
5Y*
-5.38%
10Y*
7.99%

KORU

1D
-12.29%
1M
43.43%
YTD
478.17%
6M
617.53%
1Y
1,709.41%
3Y*
122.40%
5Y*
20.22%
10Y*
17.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNA vs. KORU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
53.14%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%39.15%
KORU
Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares
478.17%432.73%-62.18%28.61%-70.16%-33.86%48.78%5.47%-59.89%167.08%

Correlation

The correlation between TNA and KORU is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2013

0.52

The correlation between TNA and KORU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

TNA vs. KORU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TNA
KORU

Industrials

17.5%
20.4%

Technology

16.9%
52.3%

Healthcare

16.5%
3.5%

Financial Services

15.9%
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
5.8%

Real Estate

6.2%

-

Energy

6.2%
1.4%

Basic Materials

4.8%
2.0%

Utilities

2.9%
0.4%

Communication Services

2.5%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
1.8%

Industrials

TNA
17.5%
KORU
20.4%

Technology

TNA
16.9%
KORU
52.3%

Healthcare

TNA
16.5%
KORU
3.5%

Financial Services

TNA
15.9%
KORU
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

TNA
8.4%
KORU
5.8%

Real Estate

TNA
6.2%
KORU

-

Energy

TNA
6.2%
KORU
1.4%

Basic Materials

TNA
4.8%
KORU
2.0%

Utilities

TNA
2.9%
KORU
0.4%

Communication Services

TNA
2.5%
KORU
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

TNA
2.4%
KORU
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNA vs. KORU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

KORU
KORU Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
KORU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KORU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
KORU Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
KORU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
KORU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNA vs. KORU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TNAKORUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-11.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.67

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

28.19

-24.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.27

89.21

-75.94

TNA vs. KORU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNA Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is lower than the KORU Sharpe Ratio of 13.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNA and KORU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TNAKORUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

13.88

-11.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.24

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

0.22

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.11

+0.12

Drawdowns

TNA vs. KORU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNA drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, smaller than the maximum KORU drawdown of -95.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNA and KORU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNAKORUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.09%

-95.79%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.53%

-61.39%

+28.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.78%

-73.71%

+7.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.36%

-93.35%

+10.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.09%

-95.79%

+7.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.23%

-17.01%

-18.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.90%

-57.52%

+23.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.86%

19.36%

-9.50%

Volatility

TNA vs. KORU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) is 17.02%, while Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU) has a volatility of 60.60%. This indicates that TNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KORU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNAKORUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.02%

60.60%

-43.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.45%

111.66%

-71.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.06%

124.91%

-67.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.34%

85.28%

-17.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.42%

79.99%

-11.57%

TNA vs. KORU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNA has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is lower than KORU's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

TNA vs. KORU - Dividend Comparison

TNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than KORU's 0.16% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
KORU
Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares
0.16%0.89%4.10%2.55%0.48%0.76%0.01%0.93%1.40%3.59%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.39%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


TNA and KORU have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KORU has higher volatility (60.60%) compared to TNA (17.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNA dropped -88.09% vs KORU's -95.79%.

On 10-year performance, KORU leads with 17.48% vs 7.99% for TNA. On fees, TNA is cheaper at 1.14% per year. On volatility, TNA has been the lower-risk option at 17.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KORU has performed better with a 17.48% return vs 7.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TNA is cheaper with a 1.14% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for KORU.

TNA has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.16% for KORU.

TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%), while KORU tracks MSCI Korea 25-50 Index. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for TNA and 1.29% for KORU.

KORU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.88 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNA and KORU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer