PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNA vs. DFEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNA vs. DFEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares (DFEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNA achieves a 53.14% return, which is significantly higher than DFEN's 11.16% return.


TNA

1D
4.51%
1M
8.55%
YTD
53.14%
6M
43.09%
1Y
130.31%
3Y*
31.74%
5Y*
-5.38%
10Y*
7.99%

DFEN

1D
8.80%
1M
20.99%
YTD
11.16%
6M
26.30%
1Y
71.41%
3Y*
69.28%
5Y*
28.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNA vs. DFEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
53.14%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%31.61%
DFEN
Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares
11.16%156.62%27.07%24.70%6.99%12.72%-70.23%95.09%-32.86%83.64%

Correlation

The correlation between TNA and DFEN is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2017

0.70

The correlation between TNA and DFEN shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TNA vs. DFEN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TNA
DFEN

Industrials

17.5%
19.7%

Technology

16.9%
0.0%

Healthcare

16.5%

-

Financial Services

15.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%

-

Real Estate

6.2%

-

Energy

6.2%

-

Basic Materials

4.8%

-

Utilities

2.9%

-

Communication Services

2.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.4%

-

Industrials

TNA
17.5%
DFEN
19.7%

Technology

TNA
16.9%
DFEN
0.0%

Healthcare

TNA
16.5%
DFEN

-

Financial Services

TNA
15.9%
DFEN

-

Consumer Cyclical

TNA
8.4%
DFEN

-

Real Estate

TNA
6.2%
DFEN

-

Energy

TNA
6.2%
DFEN

-

Basic Materials

TNA
4.8%
DFEN

-

Utilities

TNA
2.9%
DFEN

-

Communication Services

TNA
2.5%
DFEN

-

Consumer Defensive

TNA
2.4%
DFEN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNA vs. DFEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DFEN
DFEN Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
DFEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEN Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEN Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNA vs. DFEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares (DFEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TNADFENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.21

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

1.72

+2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.27

4.11

+9.16

TNA vs. DFEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNA Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the DFEN Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNA and DFEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TNADFENDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.13

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.48

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.23

+0.01

Drawdowns

TNA vs. DFEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNA drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, roughly equal to the maximum DFEN drawdown of -91.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNA and DFEN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNADFENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.09%

-91.36%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.53%

-41.75%

+9.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.78%

-43.13%

-22.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.36%

-56.23%

-26.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.23%

-27.15%

-8.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.90%

-45.26%

+11.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.86%

17.45%

-7.59%

Volatility

TNA vs. DFEN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) is 17.02%, while Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares (DFEN) has a volatility of 23.68%. This indicates that TNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNADFENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.02%

23.68%

-6.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.45%

53.64%

-13.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.06%

63.76%

-6.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.34%

60.27%

+7.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.42%

71.52%

-3.10%

TNA vs. DFEN - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNA has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than DFEN's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TNA vs. DFEN - Dividend Comparison

TNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than DFEN's 8.03% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFEN
Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares
8.03%8.89%14.12%1.13%0.46%1.89%0.48%0.50%1.07%1.50%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.39%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


TNA and DFEN have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFEN has higher volatility (23.68%) compared to TNA (17.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNA dropped -88.09% vs DFEN's -91.36%.

On 5-year performance, DFEN leads with 28.69% vs -5.38% for TNA. On fees, DFEN is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TNA has been the lower-risk option at 17.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DFEN has performed better with a 28.69% return vs -5.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFEN is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for TNA.

DFEN has the higher dividend yield at 8.03%, compared with 0.39% for TNA.

TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%), while DFEN tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.14% for TNA and 0.99% for DFEN.

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNA and DFEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer