TMVE vs. DBC
TMVE (Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF) and DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TMVE is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. TMVE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBC.
Performance
TMVE vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMVE achieves a 15.55% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 33.63% return.
TMVE
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 15.55%
- 6M
- 16.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBC
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- 33.63%
- 6M
- 33.19%
- 1Y
- 44.46%
- 3Y*
- 14.67%
- 5Y*
- 12.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.83%
TMVE vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 15.55% | 6.04% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 33.63% | 0.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMVE and DBC is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMVE vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
TMVE
DBC
TMVE vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMVE | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.30 | 0.11 | +3.18 |
Drawdowns
TMVE vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMVE drawdown since its inception was -8.21%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMVE and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMVE | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -76.36% | +68.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -22.70% | +22.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.53% | -46.22% | +44.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.33% | — |
Volatility
TMVE vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMVE | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 18.73% | -4.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 19.18% | -5.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 17.81% | -3.90% |
TMVE vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMVE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMVE vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
TMVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than DBC's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.49% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% |
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 0.10% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMVE and DBC have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMVE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMVE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
DBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.10% for TMVE.
TMVE is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while DBC is Commodities. TMVE tracks Actively Managed, while DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMVE and 0.85% for DBC.
Find the right allocation for TMVE and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer