TMUS vs. GRNY
TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) is a stock, while GRNY (Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tidal ETFs. Over the past year, TMUS returned -26.06% vs 26.59% for GRNY. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
TMUS vs. GRNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMUS achieves a -11.22% return, which is significantly lower than GRNY's 9.21% return.
TMUS
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -7.35%
- YTD
- -11.22%
- 6M
- -11.83%
- 1Y
- -26.06%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.85%
- 10Y*
- 16.10%
GRNY
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 26.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMUS vs. GRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | -11.22% | -6.58% | -4.30% |
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF | 9.21% | 24.05% | -1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMUS and GRNY is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024 | -0.13 |
The correlation between TMUS and GRNY shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMUS vs. GRNY — Risk / Return Rank
TMUS
GRNY
TMUS vs. GRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMUS | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.26 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 2.30 | -3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 7.00 | -8.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMUS | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | 1.50 | -2.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.89 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
TMUS vs. GRNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMUS drawdown since its inception was -86.29%, which is greater than GRNY's maximum drawdown of -24.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMUS and GRNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMUS | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.29% | -24.18% | -62.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.37% | -11.63% | -18.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.12% | -2.59% | -30.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.96% | -4.01% | -21.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.64% | 3.81% | +13.83% |
Volatility
TMUS vs. GRNY - Volatility Comparison
T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) at 5.02%. This indicates that TMUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMUS | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 5.02% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.14% | 13.09% | +6.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.04% | 17.86% | +7.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.86% | 23.25% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.08% | 23.25% | +2.83% |
Dividends
TMUS vs. GRNY - Dividend Comparison
TMUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, while GRNY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 2.21% | 1.80% | 1.28% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMUS and GRNY have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMUS has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to GRNY (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMUS dropped -86.29% vs GRNY's -24.18%.
GRNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMUS and GRNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer