TMSL vs. TQQQ
TMSL (T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - TMSL is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). TMSL is actively managed, while TQQQ is passively managed. Over the past year, TMSL returned 31.37% vs 137.89% for TQQQ. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMSL charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
TMSL vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMSL achieves a 16.49% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return.
TMSL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 16.49%
- 6M
- 16.75%
- 1Y
- 31.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TQQQ
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 33.35%
- YTD
- 64.46%
- 6M
- 55.93%
- 1Y
- 137.89%
- 3Y*
- 69.49%
- 5Y*
- 28.37%
- 10Y*
- 45.33%
TMSL vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSL T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF | 16.49% | 11.95% | 15.81% | 11.22% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 64.46% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 23.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMSL and TQQQ is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023 | 0.67 |
The correlation between TMSL and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
TMSL vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMSL
TQQQ
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
TMSL
TQQQ
Industrials
TMSL
TQQQ
Financial Services
TMSL
TQQQ
Healthcare
TMSL
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
TMSL
TQQQ
Energy
TMSL
TQQQ
Real Estate
TMSL
TQQQ
Basic Materials
TMSL
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
TMSL
TQQQ
Utilities
TMSL
TQQQ
Communication Services
TMSL
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMSL vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
TMSL
TQQQ
TMSL vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMSL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 3.75 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.55 | 12.27 | -0.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMSL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.92 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.74 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
TMSL vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMSL drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSL and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMSL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.39% | -81.66% | +57.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.19% | -36.97% | +25.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -58.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -0.76% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -18.52% | +14.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 11.28% | -8.56% |
Volatility
TMSL vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) is 5.40%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that TMSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMSL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 13.29% | -7.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | 36.04% | -22.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.27% | 47.60% | -30.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 66.53% | -48.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 65.96% | -47.57% |
TMSL vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMSL has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMSL vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
TMSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSL T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF | 0.49% | 0.57% | 0.44% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.36% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMSL and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to TMSL (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMSL dropped -24.39% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 1-year performance, TQQQ leads with 137.89% vs 31.37% for TMSL. On fees, TMSL is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, TMSL has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 137.89% return vs 31.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TMSL is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.
TMSL has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.
TMSL is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMSL and 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMSL and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer