PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMSL vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMSL vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMSL achieves a 19.11% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 23.06% return.


TMSL

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.41%
6M
13.24%
YTD
19.11%
1Y
31.13%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.08%

TQQQ

1D
2.09%
1M
-11.90%
6M
20.14%
YTD
23.06%
1Y
56.87%
3Y*
43.81%
5Y*
15.36%
10Y*
39.46%
ALL TIME*
42.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$17.24M$15.88M$18.32M
$4.37B$4.57B$5.33B

TMSL vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TMSL
T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF
19.11%11.95%15.81%11.79%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
23.06%34.35%58.27%27.55%

Correlation

The correlation between TMSL and TQQQ is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2023

0.68

The correlation between TMSL and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

TMSL vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TMSL
TQQQ

Technology

17.5%
53.8%

Healthcare

16.9%
4.2%

Industrials

16.7%
2.8%

Financial Services

15.9%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
12.3%

Energy

6.1%
0.6%

Real Estate

6.0%
0.1%

Basic Materials

5.7%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
7.7%

Utilities

1.9%
1.4%

Communication Services

1.0%
15.8%

Technology

TMSL
17.5%
TQQQ
53.8%

Healthcare

TMSL
16.9%
TQQQ
4.2%

Industrials

TMSL
16.7%
TQQQ
2.8%

Financial Services

TMSL
15.9%
TQQQ
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

TMSL
9.6%
TQQQ
12.3%

Energy

TMSL
6.1%
TQQQ
0.6%

Real Estate

TMSL
6.0%
TQQQ
0.1%

Basic Materials

TMSL
5.7%
TQQQ
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

TMSL
2.2%
TQQQ
7.7%

Utilities

TMSL
1.9%
TQQQ
1.4%

Communication Services

TMSL
1.0%
TQQQ
15.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMSL vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMSL
TMSL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TMSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMSL Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TMSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMSL Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMSL vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMSLTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.17

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.29

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.51

3.60

+6.91

TMSL vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMSL Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMSL and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMSL vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMSL drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSL and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMSLTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.39%

-81.66%

+57.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.19%

-36.97%

+25.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.39%

-58.04%

+33.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-25.74%

+23.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-18.49%

+14.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

13.24%

-10.44%

Volatility

TMSL vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) is 4.36%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.41%. This indicates that TMSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMSLTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

20.41%

-16.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.96%

47.79%

-32.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.45%

57.62%

-39.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.49%

68.04%

-49.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.49%

66.57%

-48.08%

TMSL vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMSL has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMSL vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

TMSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than TQQQ's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TMSL
T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF
0.48%0.57%0.44%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.58%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMSL and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (20.41%) compared to TMSL (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMSL dropped -24.39% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 3-year performance, TQQQ leads with 43.81% vs 17.77% for TMSL. On fees, TMSL is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, TMSL has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 43.81% return vs 17.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TMSL is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.48% for TMSL.

TMSL is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMSL and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TMSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMSL and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer