PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMSL vs. TFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMSL vs. TFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMSL achieves a 16.49% return, which is significantly higher than TFLR's 1.39% return.


TMSL

1D
0.02%
1M
3.85%
YTD
16.49%
6M
16.75%
1Y
31.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TFLR

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.39%
6M
2.07%
1Y
5.72%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMSL vs. TFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TMSL
T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF
16.49%11.95%15.81%11.22%
TFLR
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
1.39%6.57%8.77%6.63%

Correlation

The correlation between TMSL and TFLR is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMSL vs. TFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMSL
TMSL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TMSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMSL Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TMSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMSL Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

TFLR
TFLR Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
TFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMSL vs. TFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMSLTFLRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.68

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.64

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

12.12

-0.57

TMSL vs. TFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMSL Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the TFLR Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMSL and TFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMSLTFLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

2.91

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

2.18

-1.14

Drawdowns

TMSL vs. TFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMSL drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, which is greater than TFLR's maximum drawdown of -4.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSL and TFLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMSLTFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.39%

-4.01%

-20.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.19%

-2.18%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.08%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-0.21%

-3.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

0.47%

+2.25%

Volatility

TMSL vs. TFLR - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) at 0.41%. This indicates that TMSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMSLTFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

0.41%

+4.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.66%

1.73%

+11.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.27%

1.98%

+15.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.39%

3.68%

+14.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

3.68%

+14.71%

TMSL vs. TFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMSL has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than TFLR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMSL vs. TFLR - Dividend Comparison

TMSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than TFLR's 6.77% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
TFLR
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
6.77%6.93%8.18%7.76%0.58%
TMSL
T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF
0.49%0.57%0.44%0.34%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMSL and TFLR have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMSL has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to TFLR (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMSL dropped -24.39% vs TFLR's -4.01%.

On 1-year performance, TMSL leads with 31.37% vs 5.72% for TFLR. On fees, TMSL is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, TFLR has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TMSL has performed better with a 31.37% return vs 5.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TMSL is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TFLR.

TFLR has the higher dividend yield at 6.77%, compared with 0.49% for TMSL.

TMSL is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while TFLR is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMSL and 0.60% for TFLR.

TFLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMSL and TFLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer