TMSL vs. OPTZ
TMSL (T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF) and OPTZ (Optimize Strategy Index ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. TMSL is actively managed, while OPTZ is passively managed. Over the past year, TMSL returned 31.37% vs 61.30% for OPTZ. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMSL charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for OPTZ.
Performance
TMSL vs. OPTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMSL achieves a 16.49% return, which is significantly lower than OPTZ's 31.51% return.
TMSL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 16.49%
- 6M
- 16.75%
- 1Y
- 31.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OPTZ
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 12.33%
- YTD
- 31.51%
- 6M
- 32.28%
- 1Y
- 61.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMSL vs. OPTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TMSL T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF | 16.49% | 11.95% | 8.97% |
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF | 31.51% | 22.83% | 16.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMSL and OPTZ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2024 | 0.89 |
The correlation between TMSL and OPTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
TMSL vs. OPTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMSL
OPTZ
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
TMSL
OPTZ
Industrials
TMSL
OPTZ
Financial Services
TMSL
OPTZ
Healthcare
TMSL
OPTZ
Consumer Cyclical
TMSL
OPTZ
Energy
TMSL
OPTZ
Real Estate
TMSL
OPTZ
Basic Materials
TMSL
OPTZ
Consumer Defensive
TMSL
OPTZ
Utilities
TMSL
OPTZ
Communication Services
TMSL
OPTZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMSL vs. OPTZ — Risk / Return Rank
TMSL
OPTZ
TMSL vs. OPTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) and Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMSL | OPTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.57 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 5.80 | -2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.55 | 26.36 | -14.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMSL | OPTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 3.41 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 1.71 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
TMSL vs. OPTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMSL drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, smaller than the maximum OPTZ drawdown of -25.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSL and OPTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMSL | OPTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.39% | -25.75% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.19% | -10.63% | -0.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | 0.00% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -3.39% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.33% | +0.39% |
Volatility
TMSL vs. OPTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) is 5.40%, while Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that TMSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMSL | OPTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 6.09% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | 13.52% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.27% | 18.09% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 20.66% | -2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 20.66% | -2.27% |
TMSL vs. OPTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMSL has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than OPTZ's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMSL vs. OPTZ - Dividend Comparison
TMSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, more than OPTZ's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF | 0.44% | 0.58% | 0.32% | 0.00% |
TMSL T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF | 0.49% | 0.57% | 0.44% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMSL and OPTZ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OPTZ has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to TMSL (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMSL dropped -24.39% vs OPTZ's -25.75%.
On 1-year performance, OPTZ leads with 61.30% vs 31.37% for TMSL. On fees, OPTZ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TMSL has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OPTZ has performed better with a 61.30% return vs 31.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OPTZ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMSL.
TMSL has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.44% for OPTZ.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Optimize. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMSL and 0.25% for OPTZ.
OPTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMSL and OPTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer