PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMSIX vs. FSMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMSIX vs. FSMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMSIX achieves a 16.84% return, which is significantly higher than FSMAX's 15.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TMSIX having a 12.93% annualized return and FSMAX not far behind at 12.60%.


TMSIX

1D
0.53%
1M
4.09%
YTD
16.84%
6M
14.87%
1Y
22.94%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
12.93%

FSMAX

1D
-0.11%
1M
4.21%
YTD
15.43%
6M
13.08%
1Y
29.23%
3Y*
20.24%
5Y*
6.38%
10Y*
12.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMSIX vs. FSMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMSIX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S
16.84%4.64%14.08%13.90%-17.68%28.06%21.96%24.88%-10.47%18.90%
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
15.43%11.40%16.99%25.36%-26.44%12.41%32.28%28.01%-9.44%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between TMSIX and FSMAX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2011

0.93

The correlation between TMSIX and FSMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMSIX vs. FSMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMSIX
TMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMAX
FSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMSIX vs. FSMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMSIXFSMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.97

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.78

10.42

-0.64

TMSIX vs. FSMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the FSMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMSIX and FSMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMSIX vs. FSMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMSIX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, which is greater than FSMAX's maximum drawdown of -50.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSIX and FSMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMSIXFSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.10%

-50.55%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-10.26%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.18%

-26.82%

+6.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.57%

-36.31%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.66%

-50.55%

+9.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.22%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.99%

-12.13%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.92%

-0.43%

Volatility

TMSIX vs. FSMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) is 4.67%, while Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that TMSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMSIXFSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

6.07%

-1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

13.28%

-1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.78%

17.83%

-3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.46%

22.43%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.49%

30.28%

-9.79%

TMSIX vs. FSMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMSIX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMAX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMSIX vs. FSMAX - Dividend Comparison

TMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.61%, more than FSMAX's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
0.50%0.57%0.48%1.17%1.90%7.49%2.14%4.30%6.09%5.44%4.85%6.34%
TMSIX
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S
10.61%12.39%7.91%1.48%2.86%10.77%3.26%2.77%11.64%7.92%4.10%11.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, TMSIX and FSMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSMAX has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to TMSIX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMSIX dropped -56.10% vs FSMAX's -50.55%.

FSMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMSIX and FSMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer