TMSIX vs. AAUTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) and Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund (AAUTX).
TMSIX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 30, 1993. AAUTX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Oct 29, 1999.
Performance
TMSIX vs. AAUTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMSIX vs. AAUTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | -2.40% | 4.64% | 14.08% | 13.90% | -17.68% | 28.06% | 21.96% | 24.88% | -10.47% | 18.90% |
AAUTX Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund | 0.62% | 19.31% | 21.28% | 12.63% | -4.89% | 31.65% | 4.31% | 23.66% | -8.82% | 12.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMSIX achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly lower than AAUTX's 0.62% return. Over the past 10 years, TMSIX has underperformed AAUTX with an annualized return of 11.16%, while AAUTX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.84% annualized return.
TMSIX
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -8.39%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -0.70%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.16%
AAUTX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -6.35%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 17.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.86%
- 5Y*
- 12.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMSIX vs. AAUTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMSIX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than AAUTX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMSIX vs. AAUTX — Risk / Return Rank
TMSIX
AAUTX
TMSIX vs. AAUTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) and Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund (AAUTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMSIX | AAUTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.34 | 1.20 | -0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.62 | 1.70 | -1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.26 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 1.47 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.38 | 6.71 | -5.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMSIX | AAUTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 1.20 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.80 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.67 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.43 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMSIX and AAUTX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TMSIX vs. AAUTX - Dividend Comparison
TMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.70%, more than AAUTX's 5.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | 12.70% | 12.39% | 7.91% | 1.48% | 2.86% | 10.77% | 3.26% | 2.77% | 11.64% | 7.92% | 4.10% | 11.95% |
AAUTX Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund | 5.25% | 5.28% | 16.25% | 3.22% | 6.12% | 7.62% | 6.33% | 1.52% | 7.44% | 1.08% | 1.18% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TMSIX vs. AAUTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMSIX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, roughly equal to the maximum AAUTX drawdown of -54.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSIX and AAUTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMSIX | AAUTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.10% | -54.34% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -11.71% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.57% | -18.71% | -12.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.66% | -38.88% | -1.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.97% | -6.45% | -2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.06% | -8.03% | -2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 2.56% | +0.73% |
Volatility
TMSIX vs. AAUTX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund (AAUTX) at 3.62%. This indicates that TMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAUTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMSIX | AAUTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 3.62% | +1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.71% | 8.40% | +2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.02% | 15.83% | +3.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.37% | 15.89% | +4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 17.81% | +2.59% |