TMSF vs. CRDT
TMSF (T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF) and CRDT (Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMSF charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CRDT.
Performance
TMSF vs. CRDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMSF achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly lower than CRDT's 2.58% return.
TMSF
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRDT
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 3.24%
- 1Y
- 2.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMSF vs. CRDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMSF T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF | 1.71% | 1.29% |
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF | 2.58% | 0.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMSF and CRDT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMSF vs. CRDT — Risk / Return Rank
TMSF
CRDT
TMSF vs. CRDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF (TMSF) and Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMSF | CRDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.99 | 0.59 | +1.40 |
Drawdowns
TMSF vs. CRDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMSF drawdown since its inception was -2.28%, smaller than the maximum CRDT drawdown of -9.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSF and CRDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMSF | CRDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -9.80% | +7.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -2.66% | +2.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.38% | -2.32% | +1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.40% | — |
Volatility
TMSF vs. CRDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMSF | CRDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94% | 8.77% | -5.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.94% | 7.05% | -4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.94% | 7.05% | -4.11% |
TMSF vs. CRDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMSF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than CRDT's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMSF vs. CRDT - Dividend Comparison
TMSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than CRDT's 6.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF | 6.29% | 7.04% | 7.29% | 2.59% |
TMSF T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF | 3.06% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMSF and CRDT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMSF is cheaper at 0.37% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMSF is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CRDT.
CRDT has the higher dividend yield at 6.29%, compared with 3.06% for TMSF.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for TMSF and 0.50% for CRDT.
Find the right allocation for TMSF and CRDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer