PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMNIX vs. ACTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMNIX vs. ACTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX) and Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund (ACTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMNIX achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than ACTHX's 2.64% return.


TMNIX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.92%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.59%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
4.13%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*

ACTHX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.93%
YTD
2.64%
6M
2.85%
1Y
7.62%
3Y*
4.73%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
2.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMNIX vs. ACTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TMNIX
Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund
1.46%2.56%3.92%6.85%-3.12%2.96%6.73%8.70%0.12%
ACTHX
Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund
2.64%4.38%5.54%4.34%-13.94%6.29%3.25%10.12%0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between TMNIX and ACTHX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2018

0.60

The correlation between TMNIX and ACTHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMNIX vs. ACTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMNIX
TMNIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TMNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
TMNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

ACTHX
ACTHX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ACTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ACTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMNIX vs. ACTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX) and Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund (ACTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMNIXACTHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.48

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.58

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.13

8.38

-1.25

TMNIX vs. ACTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMNIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the ACTHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMNIX and ACTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMNIXACTHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.03

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.12

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

1.10

+0.30

Drawdowns

TMNIX vs. ACTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMNIX drawdown since its inception was -4.63%, smaller than the maximum ACTHX drawdown of -27.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMNIX and ACTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMNIXACTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-27.29%

+22.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.26%

-2.98%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.61%

-10.13%

+5.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.63%

-19.83%

+15.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

0.00%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-3.55%

+2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.92%

-0.11%

Volatility

TMNIX vs. ACTHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX) is 1.09%, while Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund (ACTHX) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that TMNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMNIXACTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

1.40%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.99%

2.73%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53%

3.83%

-1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.04%

5.72%

-2.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.69%

5.39%

-2.70%

TMNIX vs. ACTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMNIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ACTHX's 1.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMNIX vs. ACTHX - Dividend Comparison

TMNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than ACTHX's 5.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACTHX
Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund
5.34%7.14%5.64%4.22%4.72%3.95%4.33%4.70%4.78%4.71%5.11%4.93%
TMNIX
Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund
3.13%2.79%3.31%3.40%0.36%4.39%2.36%3.69%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMNIX and ACTHX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACTHX has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to TMNIX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMNIX dropped -4.63% vs ACTHX's -27.29%.

TMNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMNIX and ACTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer