PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACTHX vs. RVNU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACTHX vs. RVNU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund (ACTHX) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACTHX achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than RVNU's 2.38% return. Over the past 10 years, ACTHX has outperformed RVNU with an annualized return of 2.45%, while RVNU has yielded a comparatively lower 1.68% annualized return.


ACTHX

1D
-0.49%
1M
-2.39%
6M
0.90%
YTD
1.36%
1Y
6.75%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
0.06%
10Y*
2.45%
ALL TIME*
4.39%

RVNU

1D
-0.44%
1M
-2.64%
6M
1.68%
YTD
2.38%
1Y
7.65%
3Y*
2.77%
5Y*
-0.74%
10Y*
1.68%
ALL TIME*
2.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$970.49K$605.73K$654.06K

ACTHX vs. RVNU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACTHX
Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund
1.36%4.38%5.54%4.34%-13.94%6.29%3.25%10.12%1.44%9.10%
RVNU
Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF
2.38%0.58%1.46%11.19%-16.60%2.28%6.54%10.16%-0.56%8.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ACTHX and RVNU is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013

0.45

The correlation between ACTHX and RVNU shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACTHX vs. RVNU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ACTHX
ACTHX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ACTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ACTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

RVNU
RVNU Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RVNU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RVNU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
RVNU Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
RVNU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
RVNU Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ACTHX vs. RVNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund (ACTHX) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACTHXRVNUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.31

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

3.12

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.02

10.37

-0.35

ACTHX vs. RVNU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACTHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the RVNU Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACTHX and RVNU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACTHX vs. RVNU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACTHX drawdown since its inception was -27.29%, which is greater than RVNU's maximum drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACTHX and RVNU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACTHXRVNUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.29%

-23.51%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-2.64%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.79%

-9.81%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.83%

-23.21%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.83%

-23.51%

+3.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-4.05%

+1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-4.95%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.79%

+0.02%

Volatility

ACTHX vs. RVNU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund (ACTHX) is 1.03%, while Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) has a volatility of 1.50%. This indicates that ACTHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RVNU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACTHXRVNUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

1.50%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.90%

3.70%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.78%

5.01%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.75%

7.22%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.40%

7.25%

-1.85%

ACTHX vs. RVNU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACTHX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than RVNU's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACTHX vs. RVNU - Dividend Comparison

ACTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than RVNU's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACTHX
Invesco High Yield Municipal Fund
4.98%7.14%5.64%4.22%4.72%3.95%4.33%4.70%4.78%4.71%5.11%4.93%
RVNU
Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF
3.30%3.46%3.06%2.79%2.81%2.18%2.43%2.75%2.76%2.49%2.72%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACTHX and RVNU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RVNU has higher volatility (1.50%) compared to ACTHX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACTHX dropped -27.29% vs RVNU's -23.51%.

ACTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACTHX and RVNU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer