TMMAX vs. DDVCX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

TMMAX (SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund) and DDVCX (Nomura Value Fund Class C) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TMMAX returned 9.96%/yr vs 6.89%/yr for DDVCX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMMAX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.72%/yr for DDVCX.

Performance

TMMAX vs. DDVCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX) and Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMMAX achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly lower than DDVCX's 5.50% return. Over the past 10 years, TMMAX has outperformed DDVCX with an annualized return of 9.96%, while DDVCX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.89% annualized return.

TMMAX

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: -2.27%
• YTD: 3.01%
• 6M: 1.99%
• 1Y: 8.00%
• 3Y*: 11.95%
• 5Y*: 9.35%
• 10Y*: 9.96%

DDVCX

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.50%
• 6M: 4.36%
• 1Y: 15.49%
• 3Y*: 8.86%
• 5Y*: 5.07%
• 10Y*: 6.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMMAX vs. DDVCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TMMAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund	3.01%	11.03%	17.07%	7.32%	-3.11%	24.10%	1.32%	24.00%	-2.84%	15.19%
DDVCX Nomura Value Fund Class C	5.50%	9.95%	5.68%	1.06%	-4.57%	20.87%	-0.63%	19.33%	-3.92%	12.51%

Correlation

The correlation between TMMAX and DDVCX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2007	0.89

The correlation between TMMAX and DDVCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TMMAX vs. DDVCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMMAX

TMMAX Risk / Return Rank: 18
TMMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
TMMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
TMMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
TMMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
TMMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

DDVCX

DDVCX Risk / Return Rank: 29
DDVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
DDVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
DDVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
DDVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
DDVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMMAX vs. DDVCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX) and Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMMAX	DDVCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.32	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	1.96	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.24	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	1.87	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.99	5.23	-0.24

TMMAX vs. DDVCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the DDVCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMMAX and DDVCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TMMAX vs. DDVCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMMAX drawdown since its inception was -41.50%, smaller than the maximum DDVCX drawdown of -54.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMMAX and DDVCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMMAX	DDVCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.50%	-54.29%	+12.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.78%	-8.59%	+2.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.00%	-18.71%	-4.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.00%	-18.71%	-4.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.41%	-37.60%	+4.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.13%	-4.31%	-3.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.57%	-9.02%	+3.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.69%	3.06%	-1.37%

Volatility

TMMAX vs. DDVCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX) is 2.85%, while Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that TMMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DDVCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMMAX	DDVCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.85%	3.65%	-0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.20%	9.23%	-3.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.41%	12.16%	-3.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.07%	14.57%	+4.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.81%	17.06%	+0.75%

TMMAX vs. DDVCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMMAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than DDVCX's 1.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMMAX vs. DDVCX - Dividend Comparison

TMMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.56%, less than DDVCX's 24.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DDVCX Nomura Value Fund Class C	24.97%	26.55%	30.88%	10.78%	9.46%	23.96%	1.92%	4.13%	5.29%	3.08%	1.57%	1.97%
TMMAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund	24.56%	25.19%	23.39%	15.23%	6.54%	4.73%	2.15%	3.67%	4.91%	4.10%	4.17%	5.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMMAX and DDVCX in my portfolio?

TMMAX and DDVCX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMMAX or DDVCX?

DDVCX has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to TMMAX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMMAX dropped -41.50% vs DDVCX's -54.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DDVCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.