PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMMAX vs. RIDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMMAX vs. RIDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX) and The Income Fund of America Class R-1 (RIDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TMMAX having a 8.33% return and RIDAX slightly lower at 7.96%. Over the past 10 years, TMMAX has outperformed RIDAX with an annualized return of 9.93%, while RIDAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.


TMMAX

1D
-1.22%
1M
2.01%
6M
5.67%
YTD
8.33%
1Y
13.78%
3Y*
13.06%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
9.93%
ALL TIME*
9.46%

RIDAX

1D
0.25%
1M
1.17%
6M
4.21%
YTD
7.96%
1Y
15.38%
3Y*
12.18%
5Y*
7.40%
10Y*
7.48%
ALL TIME*
8.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TMMAX vs. RIDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMMAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund
8.33%11.03%17.07%7.32%-3.11%24.10%1.32%24.00%-2.84%15.19%
RIDAX
The Income Fund of America Class R-1
7.96%16.83%9.49%6.16%-7.14%16.47%3.68%17.57%-6.06%11.86%

Correlation

The correlation between TMMAX and RIDAX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2007

0.88

The correlation between TMMAX and RIDAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMMAX vs. RIDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMMAX
TMMAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
TMMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
TMMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

RIDAX
RIDAX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
RIDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
RIDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMMAX vs. RIDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX) and The Income Fund of America Class R-1 (RIDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMMAXRIDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.34

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.56

8.35

-0.79

TMMAX vs. RIDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the RIDAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMMAX and RIDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMMAX vs. RIDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMMAX drawdown since its inception was -41.50%, roughly equal to the maximum RIDAX drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMMAX and RIDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMMAXRIDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.50%

-42.37%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.78%

-6.13%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.00%

-8.71%

-14.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.00%

-16.28%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.41%

-26.22%

-7.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.38%

-0.18%

-3.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-4.38%

-1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.72%

-0.03%

Volatility

TMMAX vs. RIDAX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to The Income Fund of America Class R-1 (RIDAX) at 1.96%. This indicates that TMMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMMAXRIDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

1.96%

+2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.18%

5.82%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.95%

7.37%

+1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.13%

9.45%

+9.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.83%

10.64%

+7.19%

TMMAX vs. RIDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMMAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than RIDAX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMMAX vs. RIDAX - Dividend Comparison

TMMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.27%, more than RIDAX's 8.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RIDAX
The Income Fund of America Class R-1
8.60%9.24%5.14%2.38%6.20%5.92%2.09%4.25%6.58%3.68%2.32%4.26%
TMMAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund
23.27%25.19%23.39%15.23%6.54%4.73%2.15%3.67%4.91%4.10%4.17%5.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMMAX and RIDAX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMMAX has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to RIDAX (1.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMMAX dropped -41.50% vs RIDAX's -42.37%.

RIDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMMAX and RIDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer