PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMLP vs. TBLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMLP vs. TBLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise MLP ETF (TMLP) and Tortoise Global Water Fund (TBLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMLP achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly higher than TBLU's 1.22% return.


TMLP

1D
-0.85%
1M
0.12%
6M
16.69%
YTD
16.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TBLU

1D
0.38%
1M
2.00%
6M
-2.13%
YTD
1.22%
1Y
-1.40%
3Y*
10.07%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMLP vs. TBLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TMLP
Tortoise MLP ETF
16.89%0.01%
TBLU
Tortoise Global Water Fund
1.22%-1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between TMLP and TBLU is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025

-0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMLP vs. TBLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMLP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


TBLU
TBLU Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMLP vs. TBLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise MLP ETF (TMLP) and Tortoise Global Water Fund (TBLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMLPTBLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.23

TMLP vs. TBLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMLP vs. TBLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMLP drawdown since its inception was -8.55%, smaller than the maximum TBLU drawdown of -37.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMLP and TBLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMLPTBLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.55%

-37.58%

+29.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.44%

-8.75%

+4.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.15%

-8.16%

+6.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.20%

Volatility

TMLP vs. TBLU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMLPTBLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.22%

14.83%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

17.37%

-3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.22%

18.93%

-4.71%

TMLP vs. TBLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMLP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TBLU's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMLP vs. TBLU - Dividend Comparison

TMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than TBLU's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBLU
Tortoise Global Water Fund
3.49%3.31%1.34%1.46%1.64%1.55%1.42%1.58%1.35%1.32%
TMLP
Tortoise MLP ETF
3.83%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMLP and TBLU have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TBLU is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TBLU is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TMLP.

TMLP has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 3.49% for TBLU.

TMLP is categorized as MLPs, while TBLU is Water Equities. TMLP tracks Tortoise MLP Index, while TBLU tracks Tortoise Global Water ESG Net Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMLP and 0.40% for TBLU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMLP and TBLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer