TMLP vs. TBLU
TMLP (Tortoise MLP ETF) and TBLU (Tortoise Global Water Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Tortoise MLP Index, while TBLU is a Water Equities fund tracking the Tortoise Global Water ESG Net Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. TMLP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TBLU.
Performance
TMLP vs. TBLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMLP achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly higher than TBLU's 1.22% return.
TMLP
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 16.69%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TBLU
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- 6M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- -1.40%
- 3Y*
- 10.07%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- —
TMLP vs. TBLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMLP Tortoise MLP ETF | 16.89% | 0.01% |
TBLU Tortoise Global Water Fund | 1.22% | -1.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMLP and TBLU is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMLP vs. TBLU — Risk / Return Rank
TMLP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TBLU
TMLP vs. TBLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise MLP ETF (TMLP) and Tortoise Global Water Fund (TBLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMLP | TBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.00 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMLP vs. TBLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMLP drawdown since its inception was -8.55%, smaller than the maximum TBLU drawdown of -37.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMLP and TBLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMLP | TBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.55% | -37.58% | +29.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.44% | -8.75% | +4.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.15% | -8.16% | +6.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.20% | — |
Volatility
TMLP vs. TBLU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMLP | TBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.22% | 14.83% | -0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 17.37% | -3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 18.93% | -4.71% |
TMLP vs. TBLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMLP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TBLU's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMLP vs. TBLU - Dividend Comparison
TMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than TBLU's 3.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBLU Tortoise Global Water Fund | 3.49% | 3.31% | 1.34% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.55% | 1.42% | 1.58% | 1.35% | 1.32% |
TMLP Tortoise MLP ETF | 3.83% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMLP and TBLU have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TBLU is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TBLU is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TMLP.
TMLP has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 3.49% for TBLU.
TMLP is categorized as MLPs, while TBLU is Water Equities. TMLP tracks Tortoise MLP Index, while TBLU tracks Tortoise Global Water ESG Net Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMLP and 0.40% for TBLU.
Find the right allocation for TMLP and TBLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer