TMLCX vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TMLCX (SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax Managed Large Cap Fund) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both funds - TMLCX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 10 years, TMLCX returned 13.15%/yr vs 18.65%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMLCX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

TMLCX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax Managed Large Cap Fund (TMLCX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMLCX achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, TMLCX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 13.15%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.65% annualized return.

TMLCX

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -0.64%
• YTD: 6.97%
• 6M: 6.22%
• 1Y: 20.50%
• 3Y*: 16.18%
• 5Y*: 10.16%
• 10Y*: 13.15%

SCHG

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -3.93%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 17.91%
• 3Y*: 22.13%
• 5Y*: 13.27%
• 10Y*: 18.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMLCX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TMLCX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax Managed Large Cap Fund	6.97%	16.92%	14.52%	17.40%	-13.36%	28.49%	12.19%	28.39%	-6.25%	21.17%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	1.35%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between TMLCX and SCHG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009	0.89

The correlation between TMLCX and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (3 years) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TMLCX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMLCX

TMLCX Risk / Return Rank: 55
TMLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
TMLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
TMLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
TMLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
TMLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 28
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMLCX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax Managed Large Cap Fund (TMLCX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMLCX	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.11	+0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	1.56	+1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.20	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	1.10	+1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.90	3.58	+8.32

TMLCX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMLCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMLCX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TMLCX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMLCX drawdown since its inception was -56.64%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMLCX and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMLCX	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.64%	-34.59%	-22.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.12%	-16.41%	+8.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.75%	-23.39%	+2.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.05%	-34.59%	+11.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.87%	-34.59%	-0.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.87%	-6.46%	+4.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.67%	-5.20%	-6.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	5.02%	-3.20%

Volatility

TMLCX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax Managed Large Cap Fund (TMLCX) is 3.63%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that TMLCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMLCX	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	5.91%	-2.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.54%	12.52%	-3.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.91%	16.24%	-5.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.45%	22.38%	-5.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.02%	21.58%	-3.56%

TMLCX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMLCX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMLCX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

TMLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
TMLCX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax Managed Large Cap Fund	1.44%	1.54%	8.85%	5.10%	6.70%	4.90%	2.40%	8.58%	1.81%	1.92%	0.86%	0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMLCX and SCHG in my portfolio?

TMLCX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMLCX or SCHG?

SCHG has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to TMLCX (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMLCX dropped -56.64% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TMLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.