TMLCX vs. POGSX
TMLCX (SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax Managed Large Cap Fund) and POGSX (Pin Oak Equity) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TMLCX returned 13.15%/yr vs 14.46%/yr for POGSX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMLCX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for POGSX.
Performance
TMLCX vs. POGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMLCX achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly lower than POGSX's 16.85% return. Over the past 10 years, TMLCX has underperformed POGSX with an annualized return of 13.15%, while POGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.46% annualized return.
TMLCX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- 6.97%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- 1Y
- 20.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.15%
POGSX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 6M
- 15.45%
- 1Y
- 36.96%
- 3Y*
- 26.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- 14.46%
TMLCX vs. POGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMLCX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax Managed Large Cap Fund | 6.97% | 16.92% | 14.52% | 17.40% | -13.36% | 28.49% | 12.19% | 28.39% | -6.25% | 21.17% |
POGSX Pin Oak Equity | 16.85% | 27.41% | 18.99% | 27.16% | -25.10% | 21.42% | 10.60% | 27.72% | -6.15% | 15.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMLCX and POGSX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 1998 | 0.85 |
The correlation between TMLCX and POGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMLCX vs. POGSX — Risk / Return Rank
TMLCX
POGSX
TMLCX vs. POGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax Managed Large Cap Fund (TMLCX) and Pin Oak Equity (POGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMLCX | POGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.51 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 4.66 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.90 | 16.75 | -4.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMLCX vs. POGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMLCX drawdown since its inception was -56.64%, smaller than the maximum POGSX drawdown of -89.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMLCX and POGSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMLCX | POGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.64% | -89.46% | +32.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.12% | -8.03% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.75% | -15.76% | -4.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.05% | -29.81% | +6.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.87% | -33.05% | -1.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.87% | -1.00% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.67% | -36.67% | +25.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 2.23% | -0.41% |
Volatility
TMLCX vs. POGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax Managed Large Cap Fund (TMLCX) is 3.63%, while Pin Oak Equity (POGSX) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that TMLCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMLCX | POGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 3.89% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.54% | 12.87% | -4.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.91% | 15.32% | -4.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 17.79% | -1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 18.55% | -0.53% |
TMLCX vs. POGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMLCX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than POGSX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMLCX vs. POGSX - Dividend Comparison
TMLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than POGSX's 16.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POGSX Pin Oak Equity | 16.26% | 8.85% | 17.87% | 8.21% | 0.15% | 10.93% | 4.60% | 3.22% | 2.94% | 1.79% | 2.03% | 3.83% |
TMLCX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax Managed Large Cap Fund | 1.44% | 1.54% | 8.85% | 5.10% | 6.70% | 4.90% | 2.40% | 8.58% | 1.81% | 1.92% | 0.86% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMLCX and POGSX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POGSX has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to TMLCX (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMLCX dropped -56.64% vs POGSX's -89.46%.
POGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMLCX and POGSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer