POGSX vs. CGGR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pin Oak Equity (POGSX) and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR).

POGSX is managed by Oak Associates. It was launched on Aug 3, 1992. CGGR is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Feb 22, 2022.

Performance

POGSX vs. CGGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pin Oak Equity (POGSX) and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

POGSX vs. CGGR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
POGSX Pin Oak Equity	5.66%	27.41%	18.99%	27.16%	-15.65%
CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF	-9.62%	19.75%	32.12%	42.18%	-18.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POGSX achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly higher than CGGR's -9.62% return.

POGSX

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -5.28%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 12.41%
• 1Y: 33.37%
• 3Y*: 25.41%
• 5Y*: 11.32%
• 10Y*: 13.07%

CGGR

• 1D: 3.77%
• 1M: -6.90%
• YTD: -9.62%
• 6M: -8.41%
• 1Y: 17.45%
• 3Y*: 21.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POGSX vs. CGGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

POGSX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than CGGR's 0.39% expense ratio.

POGSX

Pin Oak Equity

CGGR

Capital Group Growth ETF

Return for Risk

POGSX vs. CGGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POGSX

POGSX Risk / Return Rank: 91
POGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
POGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
POGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
POGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
POGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

CGGR

CGGR Risk / Return Rank: 48
CGGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
CGGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
CGGR Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CGGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
CGGR Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POGSX vs. CGGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pin Oak Equity (POGSX) and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	POGSX	CGGR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	0.77	+0.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	1.25	+1.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.18	+0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	1.14	+1.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.79	4.22	+7.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

POGSX vs. CGGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the CGGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POGSX and CGGR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	POGSX	CGGR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	0.77	+0.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.60	-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between POGSX and CGGR is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

POGSX vs. CGGR - Dividend Comparison

POGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.99%, more than CGGR's 0.11% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
POGSX Pin Oak Equity	17.99%	8.85%	17.87%	8.21%	0.15%	10.93%	4.60%	3.22%	2.94%	1.79%	2.03%	3.83%
CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF	0.11%	0.10%	0.33%	0.40%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

POGSX vs. CGGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POGSX drawdown since its inception was -89.46%, which is greater than CGGR's maximum drawdown of -28.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POGSX and CGGR.

Drawdown Indicators

	POGSX	CGGR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.46%	-28.90%	-60.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.96%	-15.13%	+4.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.03%	-11.94%	+3.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.91%	-7.93%	-28.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	4.09%	-1.44%

Volatility

POGSX vs. CGGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pin Oak Equity (POGSX) is 3.76%, while Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that POGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	POGSX	CGGR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.76%	7.26%	-3.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.91%	13.02%	-0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.62%	22.64%	-3.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.85%	21.99%	-4.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.56%	21.99%	-3.43%