TMLCX vs. FGRTX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TMLCX (SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax Managed Large Cap Fund) and FGRTX (Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TMLCX returned 12.84%/yr vs 16.52%/yr for FGRTX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TMLCX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FGRTX.

Performance

TMLCX vs. FGRTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax Managed Large Cap Fund (TMLCX) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMLCX achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly lower than FGRTX's 10.85% return. Over the past 10 years, TMLCX has underperformed FGRTX with an annualized return of 12.84%, while FGRTX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.52% annualized return.

TMLCX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 3.25%
• YTD: 8.76%
• 6M: 9.60%
• 1Y: 24.04%
• 3Y*: 17.46%
• 5Y*: 10.40%
• 10Y*: 12.84%

FGRTX

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 3.19%
• YTD: 10.85%
• 6M: 13.28%
• 1Y: 32.57%
• 3Y*: 25.72%
• 5Y*: 16.31%
• 10Y*: 16.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMLCX vs. FGRTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TMLCX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax Managed Large Cap Fund	8.76%	16.92%	14.52%	17.40%	-13.36%	28.49%	12.19%	28.39%	-6.25%	21.17%
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund	10.85%	26.92%	25.98%	26.51%	-8.98%	26.29%	12.96%	31.07%	-7.44%	16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between TMLCX and FGRTX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 1998	0.95

The correlation between TMLCX and FGRTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TMLCX vs. FGRTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMLCX

TMLCX Risk / Return Rank: 62
TMLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
TMLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
TMLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
TMLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
TMLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FGRTX

FGRTX Risk / Return Rank: 83
FGRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FGRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FGRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FGRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FGRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMLCX vs. FGRTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax Managed Large Cap Fund (TMLCX) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TMLCX	FGRTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	2.81	-0.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	3.83	-0.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.51	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	3.72	-0.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.63	16.91	-3.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TMLCX vs. FGRTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMLCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the FGRTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMLCX and FGRTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMLCX	FGRTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	2.81	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.98	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.92	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.48	-0.09

Drawdowns

TMLCX vs. FGRTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMLCX drawdown since its inception was -56.64%, roughly equal to the maximum FGRTX drawdown of -56.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMLCX and FGRTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMLCX	FGRTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.64%	-56.17%	-0.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.12%	-8.99%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.75%	-18.51%	-2.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.05%	-23.35%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.87%	-35.18%	+0.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.69%	-8.72%	-2.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	1.98%	-0.18%

Volatility

TMLCX vs. FGRTX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax Managed Large Cap Fund (TMLCX) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) have volatilities of 2.68% and 2.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMLCX	FGRTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.68%	2.69%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.02%	9.06%	-1.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.55%	12.00%	-1.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.41%	16.70%	-0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.00%	18.12%	-0.12%

TMLCX vs. FGRTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMLCX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FGRTX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMLCX vs. FGRTX - Dividend Comparison

TMLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than FGRTX's 3.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund	3.51%	3.89%	2.68%	2.06%	4.38%	4.79%	7.96%	12.98%	21.72%	15.57%	1.97%	4.16%
TMLCX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax Managed Large Cap Fund	1.42%	1.54%	8.85%	5.10%	6.70%	4.90%	2.40%	8.58%	1.81%	1.92%	0.86%	0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMLCX and FGRTX in my portfolio?

TMLCX and FGRTX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMLCX or FGRTX?

FGRTX has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to TMLCX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMLCX dropped -56.64% vs FGRTX's -56.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.