TMIFX vs. FMDGX
TMIFX (Transamerica Mid Cap Growth) and FMDGX (Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TMIFX returned 5.96%/yr vs 7.23%/yr for FMDGX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMIFX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FMDGX.
Performance
TMIFX vs. FMDGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMIFX achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly higher than FMDGX's 4.88% return.
TMIFX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 7.85%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 11.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- —
FMDGX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 4.88%
- 6M
- 3.96%
- 1Y
- 6.81%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- —
TMIFX vs. FMDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMIFX Transamerica Mid Cap Growth | 10.70% | 6.85% | 16.25% | 31.92% | -32.11% | 8.15% | 30.28% | 8.09% |
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 4.88% | 8.60% | 22.03% | 25.79% | -26.67% | 12.67% | 34.84% | 4.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMIFX and FMDGX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between TMIFX and FMDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMIFX vs. FMDGX — Risk / Return Rank
TMIFX
FMDGX
TMIFX vs. FMDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Mid Cap Growth (TMIFX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMIFX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 0.49 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.10 | 0.80 | +0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.09 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 0.54 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.07 | 1.58 | +0.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMIFX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.49 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.32 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.45 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
TMIFX vs. FMDGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMIFX drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, which is greater than FMDGX's maximum drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMIFX and FMDGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMIFX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.26% | -38.59% | -16.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.00% | -14.75% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -25.30% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.26% | -38.59% | -16.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.57% | -1.09% | -11.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.14% | -11.21% | -7.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.88% | 5.05% | +0.83% |
Volatility
TMIFX vs. FMDGX - Volatility Comparison
Transamerica Mid Cap Growth (TMIFX) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) at 3.52%. This indicates that TMIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMIFX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 3.52% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.36% | 12.64% | +0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 16.46% | +0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.59% | 22.37% | +13.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.05% | 24.32% | +5.73% |
TMIFX vs. FMDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMIFX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDGX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMIFX vs. FMDGX - Dividend Comparison
TMIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.23%, more than FMDGX's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 1.77% | 1.85% | 0.47% | 0.63% | 0.81% | 6.43% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMIFX Transamerica Mid Cap Growth | 22.23% | 24.61% | 4.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 43.24% | 4.67% | 1.66% | 53.57% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, TMIFX and FMDGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TMIFX has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to FMDGX (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMIFX dropped -55.26% vs FMDGX's -38.59%.
TMIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMIFX and FMDGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer