TMIFX vs. CTIGX
TMIFX (Transamerica Mid Cap Growth) and CTIGX (Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TMIFX returned 3.15%/yr vs 7.68%/yr for CTIGX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TMIFX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for CTIGX.
Performance
TMIFX vs. CTIGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMIFX achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly lower than CTIGX's 13.72% return.
TMIFX
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -4.17%
- 6M
- 7.61%
- YTD
- 5.75%
- 1Y
- 1.42%
- 3Y*
- 11.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.41%
CTIGX
- 1D
- 3.61%
- 1M
- -9.09%
- 6M
- 13.72%
- YTD
- 13.72%
- 1Y
- 33.66%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TMIFX vs. CTIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMIFX Transamerica Mid Cap Growth | 5.75% | 6.85% | 16.25% | 31.92% | -32.11% | 8.15% | 30.28% | 7.88% |
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | 13.72% | 21.21% | 44.09% | 12.26% | -34.88% | 7.64% | 58.94% | -3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMIFX and CTIGX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2019 | 0.87 |
The correlation between TMIFX and CTIGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMIFX vs. CTIGX — Risk / Return Rank
TMIFX
CTIGX
TMIFX vs. CTIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Mid Cap Growth (TMIFX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMIFX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.20 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 1.90 | -2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.36 | 7.98 | -8.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMIFX vs. CTIGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMIFX drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, which is greater than CTIGX's maximum drawdown of -46.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMIFX and CTIGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMIFX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.26% | -46.26% | -9.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.51% | -16.83% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -29.30% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.26% | -46.26% | -9.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.47% | -13.83% | -2.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.05% | -18.30% | -0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.01% | 4.00% | +2.01% |
Volatility
TMIFX vs. CTIGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Transamerica Mid Cap Growth (TMIFX) is 4.54%, while Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) has a volatility of 9.62%. This indicates that TMIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMIFX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 9.62% | -5.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.38% | 23.84% | -9.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.21% | 29.20% | -10.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.69% | 27.53% | +8.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.89% | 29.28% | +0.61% |
TMIFX vs. CTIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMIFX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CTIGX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMIFX vs. CTIGX - Dividend Comparison
TMIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.27%, more than CTIGX's 4.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | 4.03% | 4.59% | 2.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMIFX Transamerica Mid Cap Growth | 23.27% | 24.61% | 4.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 43.24% | 4.67% | 1.66% | 53.57% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMIFX and CTIGX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTIGX has higher volatility (9.62%) compared to TMIFX (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMIFX dropped -55.26% vs CTIGX's -46.26%.
CTIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMIFX and CTIGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer