TMIFX vs. CTIGX
TMIFX (Transamerica Mid Cap Growth) and CTIGX (Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TMIFX returned 5.72%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for CTIGX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMIFX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for CTIGX.
Performance
TMIFX vs. CTIGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMIFX achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly lower than CTIGX's 26.75% return.
TMIFX
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 7.72%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 12.28%
- 3Y*
- 16.17%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- —
CTIGX
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 5.60%
- YTD
- 26.75%
- 6M
- 26.58%
- 1Y
- 55.18%
- 3Y*
- 32.42%
- 5Y*
- 11.22%
- 10Y*
- —
TMIFX vs. CTIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMIFX Transamerica Mid Cap Growth | 10.82% | 6.85% | 16.25% | 31.92% | -32.11% | 8.15% | 30.28% | 9.47% |
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | 26.75% | 21.21% | 44.09% | 12.26% | -34.88% | 7.64% | 58.94% | -3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMIFX and CTIGX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019 | 0.87 |
The correlation between TMIFX and CTIGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMIFX vs. CTIGX — Risk / Return Rank
TMIFX
CTIGX
TMIFX vs. CTIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Mid Cap Growth (TMIFX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMIFX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 2.17 | -1.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 2.80 | -1.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.36 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 4.93 | -4.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.30 | 19.52 | -17.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMIFX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 2.17 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.42 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.53 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
TMIFX vs. CTIGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMIFX drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, which is greater than CTIGX's maximum drawdown of -46.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMIFX and CTIGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMIFX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.26% | -46.26% | -9.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.00% | -11.56% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -29.30% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.26% | -46.26% | -9.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.48% | -1.95% | -10.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.15% | -18.62% | -0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.88% | 2.92% | +2.96% |
Volatility
TMIFX vs. CTIGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Transamerica Mid Cap Growth (TMIFX) is 4.32%, while Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) has a volatility of 8.90%. This indicates that TMIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMIFX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 8.90% | -4.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.38% | 20.24% | -6.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.21% | 26.25% | -9.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.59% | 26.97% | +8.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.05% | 29.11% | +0.94% |
TMIFX vs. CTIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMIFX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CTIGX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMIFX vs. CTIGX - Dividend Comparison
TMIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.20%, more than CTIGX's 3.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | 3.62% | 4.59% | 2.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMIFX Transamerica Mid Cap Growth | 22.20% | 24.61% | 4.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 43.24% | 4.67% | 1.66% | 53.57% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMIFX and CTIGX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTIGX has higher volatility (8.90%) compared to TMIFX (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMIFX dropped -55.26% vs CTIGX's -46.26%.
CTIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMIFX and CTIGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer