TMIFX vs. BFGFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TMIFX (Transamerica Mid Cap Growth) and BFGFX (Baron Focused Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TMIFX returned 5.96%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for BFGFX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMIFX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.32%/yr for BFGFX.

Performance

TMIFX vs. BFGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Mid Cap Growth (TMIFX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMIFX achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly higher than BFGFX's 1.84% return.

TMIFX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 7.85%
• YTD: 10.70%
• 6M: 9.45%
• 1Y: 11.22%
• 3Y*: 16.13%
• 5Y*: 5.96%
• 10Y*: —

BFGFX

• 1D: -1.89%
• 1M: 6.00%
• YTD: 1.84%
• 6M: 12.90%
• 1Y: 21.99%
• 3Y*: 20.72%
• 5Y*: 12.80%
• 10Y*: 20.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMIFX vs. BFGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TMIFX Transamerica Mid Cap Growth	10.70%	6.85%	16.25%	31.92%	-32.11%	8.15%	30.28%	42.96%	-19.90%	12.49%
BFGFX Baron Focused Growth Fund	1.84%	21.94%	29.52%	27.40%	-28.21%	18.67%	122.38%	30.05%	3.76%	20.26%

Correlation

The correlation between TMIFX and BFGFX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017	0.78

The correlation between TMIFX and BFGFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TMIFX vs. BFGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMIFX

TMIFX Risk / Return Rank: 8
TMIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
TMIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
TMIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
TMIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
TMIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

BFGFX

BFGFX Risk / Return Rank: 26
BFGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
BFGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
BFGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BFGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BFGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMIFX vs. BFGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Mid Cap Growth (TMIFX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TMIFX	BFGFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	1.19	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	2.18	-1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.25	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.81	2.32	-1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.07	6.26	-4.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TMIFX vs. BFGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMIFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the BFGFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMIFX and BFGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMIFX	BFGFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71	1.19	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	0.58	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.70	-0.40

Drawdowns

TMIFX vs. BFGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMIFX drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, smaller than the maximum BFGFX drawdown of -59.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMIFX and BFGFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMIFX	BFGFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.26%	-59.52%	+4.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.00%	-9.74%	-5.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.66%	-21.00%	-4.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.26%	-35.93%	-19.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.57%	-1.89%	-10.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.14%	-12.37%	-6.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.88%	3.61%	+2.27%

Volatility

TMIFX vs. BFGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Transamerica Mid Cap Growth (TMIFX) is 4.34%, while Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that TMIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMIFX	BFGFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.34%	5.18%	-0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.36%	15.67%	-2.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.18%	19.05%	-1.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.59%	22.34%	+13.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.05%	23.99%	+6.06%

TMIFX vs. BFGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMIFX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BFGFX's 1.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMIFX vs. BFGFX - Dividend Comparison

TMIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.23%, while BFGFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BFGFX Baron Focused Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	12.28%	15.53%	2.85%	1.78%	1.07%	2.11%	6.02%	5.80%
TMIFX Transamerica Mid Cap Growth	22.23%	24.61%	4.10%	0.00%	0.00%	43.24%	4.67%	1.66%	53.57%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMIFX and BFGFX in my portfolio?

TMIFX and BFGFX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMIFX or BFGFX?

BFGFX has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to TMIFX (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMIFX dropped -55.26% vs BFGFX's -59.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BFGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.