TMFM vs. TMFG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG).

TMFM and TMFG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TMFM is an actively managed fund by Motley Fool. It was launched on Jun 17, 2014. TMFG is an actively managed fund by Motley Fool. It was launched on Jun 17, 2014.

Performance

TMFM vs. TMFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TMFM vs. TMFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF	-14.00%	-8.98%	17.54%	21.81%	-27.36%	2.08%
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF	-6.31%	6.75%	15.45%	28.36%	-28.17%	1.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFM achieves a -14.00% return, which is significantly lower than TMFG's -6.31% return.

TMFM

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: -10.04%
• YTD: -14.00%
• 6M: -18.69%
• 1Y: -19.31%
• 3Y*: 2.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TMFG

• 1D: 2.54%
• 1M: -6.31%
• YTD: -6.31%
• 6M: -5.36%
• 1Y: 2.37%
• 3Y*: 9.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFM vs. TMFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TMFM and TMFG have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

TMFM

Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF

TMFG

Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF

Return for Risk

TMFM vs. TMFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFM

TMFM Risk / Return Rank: 1
TMFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
TMFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
TMFM Omega Ratio Rank: 1
TMFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
TMFM Martin Ratio Rank: 1

TMFG

TMFG Risk / Return Rank: 16
TMFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
TMFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
TMFG Omega Ratio Rank: 15
TMFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
TMFG Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFM vs. TMFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TMFM	TMFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.91	0.14	-1.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.29	0.33	-1.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.04	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.69	0.17	-0.86
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.67	0.57	-2.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TMFM vs. TMFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFM Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the TMFG Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFM and TMFG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMFM	TMFG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.91	0.14	-1.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.21	0.09	-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between TMFM and TMFG is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

TMFM vs. TMFG - Dividend Comparison

TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than TMFG's 0.29% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.07%	0.06%	16.27%	2.55%	0.00%
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF	0.29%	0.27%	13.94%	5.42%	0.70%

Drawdowns

TMFM vs. TMFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFM drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, smaller than the maximum TMFG drawdown of -33.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFM and TMFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMFM	TMFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.75%	-33.66%	+1.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.34%	-11.81%	-15.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.02%	-9.06%	-20.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.38%	-10.83%	-4.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.28%	3.43%	+7.85%

Volatility

TMFM vs. TMFG - Volatility Comparison

Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) have volatilities of 5.83% and 5.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMFM	TMFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.83%	5.64%	+0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.76%	10.25%	+3.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.27%	16.98%	+4.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.48%	18.80%	+1.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.48%	18.80%	+1.68%