TMFM vs. QQQN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TMFM (Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. TMFM is actively managed, while QQQN is passively managed. TMFM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.

Performance

TMFM vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TMFM

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: -1.09%
• 6M: -2.45%
• YTD: -5.79%
• 1Y: -14.17%
• 3Y*: 1.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -2.04%

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF	$157.21K	$169.51K	$230.30K

TMFM vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF	2.32%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%

TMFM vs. QQQN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TMFM	QQQN
Technology	29.7%	47.3%
Healthcare	24.5%	19.9%
Industrials	21.6%	8.7%
Financial Services	14.2%	-
Real Estate	3.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.5%	13.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	1.4%
Basic Materials	-	1.9%
Communication Services	-	5.5%
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

TMFM vs. QQQN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMFM

TMFM Risk / Return Rank: 3
TMFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
TMFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
TMFM Omega Ratio Rank: 3
TMFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
TMFM Martin Ratio Rank: 4

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMFM vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMFM	QQQN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.80	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.10	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.62	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.07	—	—

Drawdowns

TMFM vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFM drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFM and QQQN.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMFM	QQQN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.75%	0.00%	-31.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.34%	0.00%	-23.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.16%	0.00%	-16.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.51%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TMFM	QQQN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.23%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.69%	0.00%	+19.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.60%	0.00%	+20.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.60%	0.00%	+20.60%

TMFM vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMFM vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.07%	0.06%	16.27%	2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, TMFM or QQQN?

On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMFM or QQQN?

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMFM or QQQN?

TMFM has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between TMFM and QQQN?

They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFM and 0.18% for QQQN.