TMFM vs. PDP
TMFM (Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and PDP (Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while PDP is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index. TMFM is actively managed, while PDP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMFM returned 3.39%/yr vs 24.44%/yr for PDP. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMFM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for PDP.
Performance
TMFM vs. PDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFM achieves a -9.50% return, which is significantly lower than PDP's 24.95% return.
TMFM
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- -9.50%
- 6M
- -11.03%
- 1Y
- -18.27%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PDP
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 24.95%
- 6M
- 24.18%
- 1Y
- 37.20%
- 3Y*
- 24.44%
- 5Y*
- 11.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
TMFM vs. PDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -9.50% | -8.98% | 17.54% | 21.81% | -27.36% | 2.08% |
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 24.95% | 8.37% | 26.06% | 20.88% | -24.49% | 2.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFM and PDP is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TMFM and PDP has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
TMFM vs. PDP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMFM
PDP
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TMFM
PDP
Healthcare
TMFM
PDP
Industrials
TMFM
PDP
Financial Services
TMFM
PDP
Real Estate
TMFM
PDP
Consumer Cyclical
TMFM
PDP
Consumer Defensive
TMFM
PDP
Basic Materials
TMFM
-
PDP
Communication Services
TMFM
-
PDP
Energy
TMFM
-
PDP
Utilities
TMFM
-
PDP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFM vs. PDP — Risk / Return Rank
TMFM
PDP
TMFM vs. PDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFM | PDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.30 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 3.15 | -3.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 11.16 | -12.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFM | PDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | 1.70 | -2.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.14 | 0.45 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
TMFM vs. PDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFM drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, smaller than the maximum PDP drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFM and PDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFM | PDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.75% | -59.34% | +27.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.34% | -11.87% | -15.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.75% | -23.79% | -7.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.35% | 0.00% | -26.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -10.61% | -5.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.65% | 3.34% | +11.31% |
Volatility
TMFM vs. PDP - Volatility Comparison
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) at 6.51%. This indicates that TMFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFM | PDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.99% | 6.51% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.54% | 17.34% | -1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.76% | 21.94% | -3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 22.00% | -1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 21.59% | -0.96% |
TMFM vs. PDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PDP's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFM vs. PDP - Dividend Comparison
TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than PDP's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.11% | 0.17% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.25% | 0.18% | 0.28% | 0.81% | 0.39% |
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.06% | 16.27% | 2.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFM and PDP have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMFM has higher volatility (7.99%) compared to PDP (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFM dropped -31.75% vs PDP's -59.34%.
On 3-year performance, PDP leads with 24.44% vs 3.39% for TMFM. On fees, PDP is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, PDP has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PDP has performed better with a 24.44% return vs 3.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PDP is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFM.
PDP has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.07% for TMFM.
TMFM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while PDP is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFM and 0.62% for PDP.
PDP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFM and PDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer