TMFM vs. IVOG
TMFM (Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and IVOG (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. TMFM is actively managed, while IVOG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMFM returned 1.83%/yr vs 13.84%/yr for IVOG. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TMFM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IVOG.
Performance
TMFM vs. IVOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFM achieves a -5.79% return, which is significantly lower than IVOG's 15.87% return.
TMFM
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- -5.79%
- 1Y
- -14.17%
- 3Y*
- 1.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.04%
IVOG
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- YTD
- 15.87%
- 1Y
- 22.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.84%
- 5Y*
- 7.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.19M | $2.83M | $3.26M | |
| $157.21K | $169.51K | $230.30K |
TMFM vs. IVOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -5.79% | -8.98% | 17.54% | 21.81% | -27.36% | 1.91% |
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF | 15.87% | 7.34% | 15.62% | 17.36% | -19.08% | 2.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFM and IVOG is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2021 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TMFM and IVOG has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFM vs. IVOG — Risk / Return Rank
TMFM
IVOG
TMFM vs. IVOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMFM | IVOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.21 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 2.20 | -2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 7.98 | -9.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMFM vs. IVOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFM drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, smaller than the maximum IVOG drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFM and IVOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFM | IVOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.75% | -39.32% | +7.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.13% | -9.69% | -15.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.75% | -25.61% | -6.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.34% | -4.80% | -18.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -5.84% | -10.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.51% | 2.67% | +11.84% |
Volatility
TMFM vs. IVOG - Volatility Comparison
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) at 4.23%. This indicates that TMFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFM | IVOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 4.23% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.23% | 14.00% | +2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.69% | 17.93% | +1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 20.70% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 20.61% | -0.01% |
TMFM vs. IVOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOG's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFM vs. IVOG - Dividend Comparison
TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than IVOG's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF | 0.56% | 0.64% | 0.79% | 1.15% | 1.05% | 0.47% | 0.74% | 1.17% | 1.01% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 1.04% |
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.06% | 16.27% | 2.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFM and IVOG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMFM has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to IVOG (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFM dropped -31.75% vs IVOG's -39.32%.
On 3-year performance, IVOG leads with 13.84% vs 1.83% for TMFM. On fees, IVOG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IVOG has performed better with a 13.84% return vs 1.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFM.
IVOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.07% for TMFM.
They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFM and 0.10% for IVOG.
IVOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFM and IVOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer