TMFG vs. MUU

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

TMFG (Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). TMFG is actively managed, while MUU is passively managed. Over the past year, TMFG returned 4.65% vs 3083.51% for MUU. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMFG charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.

Performance

TMFG vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFG achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 642.75% return.

TMFG

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 1.05%
• 6M: 0.96%
• YTD: 3.63%
• 1Y: 4.65%
• 3Y*: 12.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MUU

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: -10.27%
• 6M: 421.21%
• YTD: 642.75%
• 1Y: 3,083.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFG vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF	3.63%	6.75%	0.87%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	642.75%	599.03%	-40.91%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFG and MUU is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024	0.40

Return for Risk

TMFG vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFG

TMFG Risk / Return Rank: 14
TMFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
TMFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
TMFG Omega Ratio Rank: 13
TMFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
TMFG Martin Ratio Rank: 15

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFG vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMFG	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	27.27	-27.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.46	5.80	-5.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.72	-0.67
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	75.03	-74.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.99	245.78	-244.78

TMFG vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 27.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFG and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TMFG vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFG drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFG and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMFG	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.66%	-75.07%	+41.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.81%	-52.72%	+40.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-30.01%	+29.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.29%	-23.40%	+13.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.51%	16.41%	-12.90%

Volatility

TMFG vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) is 3.69%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 67.23%. This indicates that TMFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMFG	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.69%	67.23%	-63.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.33%	116.08%	-105.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.34%	145.04%	-131.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.50%	138.03%	-119.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.50%	138.03%	-119.53%

TMFG vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMFG vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

TMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than MUU's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.64%	4.27%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF	0.26%	0.27%	13.94%	5.42%	0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMFG and MUU in my portfolio?

TMFG and MUU have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMFG or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (67.23%) compared to TMFG (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFG dropped -33.66% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which ETF is better, TMFG or MUU?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 3083.51% vs 4.65% for TMFG. On fees, TMFG is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, TMFG has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TMFG or MUU?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 3083.51% return vs 4.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMFG or MUU?

TMFG is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMFG or MUU?

MUU has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.26% for TMFG.

What is the main difference between TMFG and MUU?

TMFG is categorized as Global Equities, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFG and 1.01% for MUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (27.27 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.