TMFG vs. GARP
TMFG (Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF) and GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while GARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. TMFG is actively managed, while GARP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMFG returned 12.53%/yr vs 33.60%/yr for GARP. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMFG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GARP.
Performance
TMFG vs. GARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFG achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 21.29% return.
TMFG
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 12.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GARP
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 11.92%
- YTD
- 21.29%
- 6M
- 21.80%
- 1Y
- 43.57%
- 3Y*
- 33.60%
- 5Y*
- 20.26%
- 10Y*
- —
TMFG vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF | 1.99% | 6.75% | 15.45% | 28.36% | -28.17% | 1.21% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 21.29% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 1.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFG and GARP is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between TMFG and GARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TMFG vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMFG
GARP
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
TMFG
GARP
Financial Services
TMFG
GARP
Communication Services
TMFG
GARP
Technology
TMFG
GARP
Consumer Cyclical
TMFG
GARP
Real Estate
TMFG
GARP
Consumer Defensive
TMFG
GARP
-
Healthcare
TMFG
GARP
Basic Materials
TMFG
GARP
Energy
TMFG
-
GARP
Utilities
TMFG
-
GARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFG vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank
TMFG
GARP
TMFG vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFG | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.41 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | 3.20 | -2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | 12.85 | -11.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFG | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 2.45 | -2.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.90 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
TMFG vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFG drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, which is greater than GARP's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFG and GARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFG | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.66% | -31.34% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -13.69% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | -23.73% | +7.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -0.73% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.49% | -7.36% | -3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 3.40% | +0.08% |
Volatility
TMFG vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) is 2.64%, while iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a volatility of 5.03%. This indicates that TMFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFG | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 5.03% | -2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 13.89% | -3.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.03% | 17.89% | -4.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 21.97% | -3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 23.89% | -5.29% |
TMFG vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFG vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison
TMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, more than GARP's 0.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% |
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF | 0.26% | 0.27% | 13.94% | 5.42% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFG and GARP have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GARP has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to TMFG (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFG dropped -33.66% vs GARP's -31.34%.
On 3-year performance, GARP leads with 33.60% vs 12.53% for TMFG. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TMFG has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GARP has performed better with a 33.60% return vs 12.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFG.
TMFG and GARP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.26%.
TMFG is categorized as Global Equities, while GARP is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFG and 0.15% for GARP.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFG and GARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer