TMFG vs. FAAR
TMFG (Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMFG returned 12.08%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for FAAR. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. TMFG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.
Performance
TMFG vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFG achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 20.23% return.
TMFG
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 4.06%
- 3Y*
- 12.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAAR
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- 20.23%
- 6M
- 19.92%
- 1Y
- 26.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
TMFG vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF | 1.05% | 6.75% | 15.45% | 28.36% | -28.17% | 1.91% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 20.23% | 8.07% | 5.97% | -5.63% | 10.15% | 1.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFG and FAAR is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2021 | -0.05 |
The correlation between TMFG and FAAR shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.03 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFG vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank
TMFG
FAAR
TMFG vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMFG | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.35 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 4.75 | -4.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.17 | 14.70 | -13.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMFG vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFG drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, which is greater than FAAR's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFG and FAAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFG | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.66% | -18.03% | -15.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -5.68% | -6.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | -11.54% | -5.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -5.43% | +2.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.39% | -7.82% | -2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 1.89% | +1.59% |
Volatility
TMFG vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF (TMFG) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) at 2.47%. This indicates that TMFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFG | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 2.47% | +1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.56% | 9.68% | +0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.49% | 13.37% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 12.95% | +5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 11.53% | +7.06% |
TMFG vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFG vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison
TMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than FAAR's 9.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 9.57% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% |
TMFG Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF | 0.27% | 0.27% | 13.94% | 5.42% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFG and FAAR have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMFG has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to FAAR (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFG dropped -33.66% vs FAAR's -18.03%.
On 3-year performance, TMFG leads with 12.08% vs 10.91% for FAAR. On fees, TMFG is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FAAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TMFG has performed better with a 12.08% return vs 10.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TMFG is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.57%, compared with 0.27% for TMFG.
TMFG is categorized as Global Equities, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFG and 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFG and FAAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer