PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMFE vs. RSSY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMFE vs. RSSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFE achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than RSSY's 32.45% return.


TMFE

1D
-0.63%
1M
1.94%
YTD
1.48%
6M
1.24%
1Y
7.52%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
10Y*

RSSY

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.78%
YTD
32.45%
6M
27.13%
1Y
47.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFE vs. RSSY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TMFE and RSSY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2024

0.54

The correlation between TMFE and RSSY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMFE vs. RSSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFE
TMFE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TMFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

RSSY
RSSY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RSSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSSY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RSSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSSY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFE vs. RSSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMFERSSYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.65

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

6.53

-5.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.49

22.39

-19.90

TMFE vs. RSSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFE Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the RSSY Sharpe Ratio of 3.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFE and RSSY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMFERSSYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

3.63

-3.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.75

-0.23

Drawdowns

TMFE vs. RSSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFE drawdown since its inception was -31.07%, which is greater than RSSY's maximum drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFE and RSSY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMFERSSYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.07%

-29.57%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-7.36%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-0.16%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-7.37%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.14%

+0.88%

Volatility

TMFE vs. RSSY - Volatility Comparison

The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY) at 2.30%. This indicates that TMFE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMFERSSYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

2.30%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

9.92%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

13.28%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

18.35%

+0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

18.35%

+0.91%

TMFE vs. RSSY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than RSSY's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMFE vs. RSSY - Dividend Comparison

TMFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than RSSY's 1.54% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
RSSY
Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF
1.54%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMFE
The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF
0.31%0.32%0.44%0.45%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMFE and RSSY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMFE has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to RSSY (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFE dropped -31.07% vs RSSY's -29.57%.

On 1-year performance, RSSY leads with 47.81% vs 7.52% for TMFE. On fees, TMFE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RSSY has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSSY has performed better with a 47.81% return vs 7.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TMFE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSSY.

RSSY has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.31% for TMFE.

They also come from different issuers: RBB Fund and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMFE and 1.04% for RSSY.

RSSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMFE and RSSY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer