TMFE vs. RSSY
TMFE (The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF) and RSSY (Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. TMFE is passively managed, while RSSY is actively managed. Over the past year, TMFE returned 7.52% vs 47.81% for RSSY. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMFE charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for RSSY.
Performance
TMFE vs. RSSY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFE achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than RSSY's 32.45% return.
TMFE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 7.52%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSSY
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 32.45%
- 6M
- 27.13%
- 1Y
- 47.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFE vs. RSSY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TMFE The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF | 1.48% | 11.10% | 12.92% |
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF | 32.45% | -3.52% | 1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFE and RSSY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2024 | 0.54 |
The correlation between TMFE and RSSY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFE vs. RSSY — Risk / Return Rank
TMFE
RSSY
TMFE vs. RSSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFE | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.65 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 6.53 | -5.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.49 | 22.39 | -19.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFE | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 3.63 | -3.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.75 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
TMFE vs. RSSY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFE drawdown since its inception was -31.07%, which is greater than RSSY's maximum drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFE and RSSY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFE | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.07% | -29.57% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -7.36% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -0.16% | -1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -7.37% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.14% | +0.88% |
Volatility
TMFE vs. RSSY - Volatility Comparison
The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY) at 2.30%. This indicates that TMFE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFE | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 2.30% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.16% | 9.92% | -0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 13.28% | -1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 18.35% | +0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 18.35% | +0.91% |
TMFE vs. RSSY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than RSSY's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFE vs. RSSY - Dividend Comparison
TMFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than RSSY's 1.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF | 1.54% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFE The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF | 0.31% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFE and RSSY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMFE has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to RSSY (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFE dropped -31.07% vs RSSY's -29.57%.
On 1-year performance, RSSY leads with 47.81% vs 7.52% for TMFE. On fees, TMFE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RSSY has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSSY has performed better with a 47.81% return vs 7.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TMFE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSSY.
RSSY has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.31% for TMFE.
They also come from different issuers: RBB Fund and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMFE and 1.04% for RSSY.
RSSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFE and RSSY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer