PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMFE vs. EBI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMFE vs. EBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFE achieves a -0.93% return, which is significantly lower than EBI's 13.67% return.


TMFE

1D
0.22%
1M
-3.36%
YTD
-0.93%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
4.62%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10Y*

EBI

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.87%
YTD
13.67%
6M
12.19%
1Y
29.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFE vs. EBI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TMFE and EBI is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025

0.79

The correlation between TMFE and EBI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMFE vs. EBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFE
TMFE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TMFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

EBI
EBI Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBI Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBI Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFE vs. EBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMFEEBIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.42

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

4.14

-3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.50

16.78

-15.28

TMFE vs. EBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFE Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the EBI Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFE and EBI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMFE vs. EBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFE drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, which is greater than EBI's maximum drawdown of -17.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFE and EBI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMFEEBIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.21%

-17.05%

-14.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-7.09%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.17%

-1.45%

-2.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-2.03%

-6.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

1.75%

+1.34%

Volatility

TMFE vs. EBI - Volatility Comparison

The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Longview Advantage ETF (EBI) at 4.01%. This indicates that TMFE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMFEEBIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

4.01%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

9.25%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

12.46%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.23%

17.85%

+1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.23%

17.85%

+1.38%

TMFE vs. EBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EBI's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMFE vs. EBI - Dividend Comparison

TMFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than EBI's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EBI
Longview Advantage ETF
0.92%1.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMFE
The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF
0.32%0.32%0.44%0.45%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMFE and EBI have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMFE has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to EBI (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFE dropped -31.21% vs EBI's -17.05%.

On 1-year performance, EBI leads with 29.25% vs 4.62% for TMFE. On fees, EBI is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, EBI has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EBI has performed better with a 29.25% return vs 4.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EBI is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TMFE.

EBI has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.32% for TMFE.

They also come from different issuers: RBB Fund and Longview. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMFE and 0.24% for EBI.

EBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMFE and EBI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer