TMFE vs. BLCR
TMFE (The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. TMFE is passively managed, while BLCR is actively managed. Over the past year, TMFE returned 7.52% vs 47.09% for BLCR. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMFE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.
Performance
TMFE vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFE achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 19.56% return.
TMFE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 7.52%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLCR
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 6.16%
- YTD
- 19.56%
- 6M
- 21.53%
- 1Y
- 47.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFE vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFE The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF | 1.48% | 11.10% | 27.95% | 17.44% |
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF | 19.56% | 30.93% | 17.07% | 14.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFE and BLCR is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023 | 0.79 |
The correlation between TMFE and BLCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
TMFE vs. BLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMFE
BLCR
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TMFE
BLCR
Consumer Cyclical
TMFE
BLCR
Communication Services
TMFE
BLCR
Consumer Defensive
TMFE
BLCR
-
Financial Services
TMFE
BLCR
Healthcare
TMFE
BLCR
Industrials
TMFE
BLCR
Basic Materials
TMFE
BLCR
Energy
TMFE
-
BLCR
Real Estate
TMFE
-
BLCR
-
Utilities
TMFE
-
BLCR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFE vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank
TMFE
BLCR
TMFE vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFE | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.52 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 4.61 | -3.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.49 | 21.86 | -19.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFE | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 3.05 | -2.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 1.90 | -1.39 |
Drawdowns
TMFE vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFE drawdown since its inception was -31.07%, which is greater than BLCR's maximum drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFE and BLCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFE | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.07% | -21.29% | -9.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -10.26% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -0.37% | -1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -2.19% | -6.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.16% | +0.86% |
Volatility
TMFE vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) is 2.84%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that TMFE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFE | BLCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 4.45% | -1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.16% | 12.24% | -3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 15.54% | -3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 17.47% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 17.47% | +1.79% |
TMFE vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFE vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison
TMFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, more than BLCR's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.75% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
TMFE The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF | 0.31% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFE and BLCR have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLCR has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to TMFE (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFE dropped -31.07% vs BLCR's -21.29%.
On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 47.09% vs 7.52% for TMFE. On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, TMFE has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 47.09% return vs 7.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TMFE.
TMFE has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.23% for BLCR.
They also come from different issuers: RBB Fund and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMFE and 0.36% for BLCR.
BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFE and BLCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer