PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMED vs. TCAF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMED vs. TCAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMED achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly higher than TCAF's 4.89% return.


TMED

1D
1.71%
1M
5.92%
YTD
10.47%
6M
9.58%
1Y
33.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TCAF

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
4.89%
6M
4.05%
1Y
16.35%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMED vs. TCAF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TMED and TCAF is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.53

The correlation between TMED and TCAF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMED vs. TCAF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMED
TMED Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
TMED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMED Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMED Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TMED Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMED Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

TCAF
TCAF Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
TCAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAF Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAF Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMED vs. TCAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMEDTCAFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

1.45

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.95

5.68

+4.27

TMED vs. TCAF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMED Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the TCAF Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMED and TCAF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMED vs. TCAF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMED drawdown since its inception was -11.11%, smaller than the maximum TCAF drawdown of -16.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMED and TCAF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMEDTCAFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.11%

-16.37%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.11%

-11.33%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.48%

+2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-2.07%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

2.88%

+0.51%

Volatility

TMED vs. TCAF - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) at 4.22%. This indicates that TMED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMEDTCAFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

4.22%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.61%

9.41%

+4.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.21%

12.00%

+6.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.08%

14.01%

+4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

14.01%

+4.07%

TMED vs. TCAF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMED has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than TCAF's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMED vs. TCAF - Dividend Comparison

TMED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, more than TCAF's 0.48% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
0.48%0.50%0.43%0.26%
TMED
T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF
0.49%0.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMED and TCAF have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMED has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to TCAF (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMED dropped -11.11% vs TCAF's -16.37%.

On 1-year performance, TMED leads with 33.64% vs 16.35% for TCAF. On fees, TCAF is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, TCAF has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TMED has performed better with a 33.64% return vs 16.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TCAF is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TMED.

TMED has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.48% for TCAF.

TMED is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while TCAF is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TMED and 0.31% for TCAF.

TMED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMED and TCAF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer