PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMED vs. PBPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMED vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TMED

1D
0.00%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PBPH

1D
1.41%
1M
0.87%
YTD
2.63%
6M
2.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMED vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TMED and PBPH is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026

-0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMED vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TMED vs. PBPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMED vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMED drawdown since its inception was -7.14%, smaller than the maximum PBPH drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMED and PBPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMEDPBPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-11.10%

+3.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.14%

-5.21%

-1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-4.36%

-0.64%

Volatility

TMED vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMEDPBPHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.28%

17.07%

+49.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.28%

17.07%

+49.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.28%

17.07%

+49.21%

TMED vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMED has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMED vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison

TMED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TMED and PBPH have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TMED.

PBPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for TMED.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TMED and 0.13% for PBPH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMED and PBPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer