TMED vs. GSKH
TMED (T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF) and GSKH (GSK plc ADRhedged ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. At a correlation of -0.39, they often move in opposite directions. TMED charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for GSKH.
Performance
TMED vs. GSKH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMED
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSKH
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 42.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMED vs. GSKH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMED T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF | -7.14% |
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF | 6.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMED and GSKH is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026 | -0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMED vs. GSKH — Risk / Return Rank
TMED
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GSKH
TMED vs. GSKH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED) and GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMED | GSKH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.06 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMED vs. GSKH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMED drawdown since its inception was -7.14%, smaller than the maximum GSKH drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMED and GSKH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMED | GSKH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.14% | -18.54% | +11.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.14% | -11.62% | +4.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | -5.86% | +0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.06% | — |
Volatility
TMED vs. GSKH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMED | GSKH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.28% | 26.14% | +40.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.28% | 26.95% | +39.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.28% | 26.95% | +39.33% |
TMED vs. GSKH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMED has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than GSKH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMED vs. GSKH - Dividend Comparison
TMED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSKH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF | 2.82% | 1.15% |
TMED T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMED and GSKH have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSKH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSKH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TMED.
GSKH has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.00% for TMED.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TMED and 0.19% for GSKH.
Find the right allocation for TMED and GSKH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer