PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMDIX vs. MMGPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMDIX vs. MMGPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMDIX achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly higher than MMGPX's -0.96% return.


TMDIX

1D
2.45%
1M
-3.41%
6M
5.22%
YTD
4.53%
1Y
-6.10%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
2.93%
10Y*
12.70%
ALL TIME*
10.91%

MMGPX

1D
2.26%
1M
-3.86%
6M
4.78%
YTD
-0.96%
1Y
-10.52%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
-6.17%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TMDIX vs. MMGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMDIX
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund
4.53%-1.76%10.84%25.07%-22.26%16.75%33.42%63.26%-4.28%20.20%
MMGPX
Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio
-0.96%12.58%41.83%44.34%-63.37%-11.55%152.67%40.20%10.89%28.18%

Correlation

The correlation between TMDIX and MMGPX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.79

The correlation between TMDIX and MMGPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMDIX vs. MMGPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMDIX
TMDIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
TMDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TMDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

MMGPX
MMGPX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MMGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
MMGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMDIX vs. MMGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMDIXMMGPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.97

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

-0.34

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.61

-0.66

+0.05

TMDIX vs. MMGPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMDIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is comparable to the MMGPX Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMDIX and MMGPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMDIX vs. MMGPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMDIX drawdown since its inception was -48.73%, smaller than the maximum MMGPX drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDIX and MMGPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMDIXMMGPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.73%

-75.38%

+26.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.45%

-27.79%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.45%

-29.27%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.53%

-72.70%

+42.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.48%

-40.82%

+28.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.19%

-30.40%

+23.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.95%

14.47%

-1.52%

Volatility

TMDIX vs. MMGPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX) is 4.81%, while Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that TMDIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMDIXMMGPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

6.84%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.06%

21.99%

-7.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.64%

28.90%

-8.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.59%

39.83%

-19.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

35.11%

-14.00%

TMDIX vs. MMGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMDIX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than MMGPX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMDIX vs. MMGPX - Dividend Comparison

Neither TMDIX nor MMGPX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMGPX
Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio
0.00%0.43%0.00%0.00%125.40%64.53%7.93%15.63%28.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMDIX
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%8.08%3.98%3.69%29.72%18.28%31.06%16.38%14.44%5.90%7.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMDIX and MMGPX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMGPX has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to TMDIX (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMDIX dropped -48.73% vs MMGPX's -75.38%.

MMGPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMDIX and MMGPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer