TMDIX vs. MCSFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TMDIX (AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund) and MCSFX (MFS Commodity Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - TMDIX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AMG, while MCSFX is a Commodities fund managed by MFS. Over the past 5 years, TMDIX returned 4.67%/yr vs 10.77%/yr for MCSFX. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMDIX charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for MCSFX.

Performance

TMDIX vs. MCSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMDIX achieves a 5.07% return, which is significantly lower than MCSFX's 24.44% return.

TMDIX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 5.57%
• YTD: 5.07%
• 6M: -6.97%
• 1Y: -3.03%
• 3Y*: 9.24%
• 5Y*: 4.67%
• 10Y*: 13.10%

MCSFX

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -2.18%
• YTD: 24.44%
• 6M: 24.59%
• 1Y: 38.29%
• 3Y*: 16.16%
• 5Y*: 10.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMDIX vs. MCSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TMDIX AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund	5.07%	-1.76%	10.84%	25.07%	-22.26%	16.75%	33.42%	41.11%
MCSFX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund	24.44%	17.09%	4.32%	-7.25%	12.27%	26.40%	-1.34%	-1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between TMDIX and MCSFX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019	0.17

The correlation between TMDIX and MCSFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TMDIX vs. MCSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMDIX

TMDIX Risk / Return Rank: 2
TMDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
TMDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
TMDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
TMDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
TMDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

MCSFX

MCSFX Risk / Return Rank: 72
MCSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
MCSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
MCSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
MCSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
MCSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMDIX vs. MCSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TMDIX	MCSFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.11	2.47	-2.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.01	3.10	-3.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.44	-0.45
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.08	4.74	-4.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.17	14.99	-15.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TMDIX vs. MCSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMDIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the MCSFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMDIX and MCSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMDIX	MCSFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11	2.47	-2.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	0.32	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.33	+0.21

Drawdowns

TMDIX vs. MCSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMDIX drawdown since its inception was -48.73%, which is greater than MCSFX's maximum drawdown of -37.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDIX and MCSFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMDIX	MCSFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.73%	-37.16%	-11.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.45%	-8.19%	-17.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.45%	-9.60%	-15.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.53%	-37.16%	+6.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.03%	-3.03%	-9.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.15%	-18.29%	+11.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.08%	2.59%	+9.49%

Volatility

TMDIX vs. MCSFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX) is 3.92%, while MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that TMDIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMDIX	MCSFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.92%	4.74%	-0.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.14%	13.69%	+3.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.56%	15.87%	+3.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.38%	34.15%	-13.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.08%	29.57%	-8.49%

TMDIX vs. MCSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMDIX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSFX's 1.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMDIX vs. MCSFX - Dividend Comparison

TMDIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MCSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.09%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MCSFX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund	12.09%	15.05%	2.25%	1.04%	26.24%	54.80%	0.15%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMDIX AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	8.08%	3.98%	3.69%	29.72%	18.28%	31.06%	16.38%	14.44%	5.90%	7.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMDIX and MCSFX in my portfolio?

TMDIX and MCSFX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMDIX or MCSFX?

MCSFX has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to TMDIX (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMDIX dropped -48.73% vs MCSFX's -37.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.