TMDIX vs. FMDGX
TMDIX (AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund) and FMDGX (Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TMDIX returned 4.67%/yr vs 7.23%/yr for FMDGX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TMDIX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FMDGX.
Performance
TMDIX vs. FMDGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TMDIX having a 5.07% return and FMDGX slightly lower at 4.88%.
TMDIX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 5.07%
- 6M
- -6.97%
- 1Y
- -3.03%
- 3Y*
- 9.24%
- 5Y*
- 4.67%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
FMDGX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 4.88%
- 6M
- 3.96%
- 1Y
- 6.81%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- —
TMDIX vs. FMDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMDIX AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund | 5.07% | -1.76% | 10.84% | 25.07% | -22.26% | 16.75% | 33.42% | 26.30% |
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 4.88% | 8.60% | 22.03% | 25.79% | -26.67% | 12.67% | 34.84% | 4.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMDIX and FMDGX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019 | 0.96 |
The correlation between TMDIX and FMDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMDIX vs. FMDGX — Risk / Return Rank
TMDIX
FMDGX
TMDIX vs. FMDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMDIX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | 0.49 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | 0.80 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.09 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 0.54 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.17 | 1.58 | -1.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMDIX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | 0.49 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.32 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.45 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
TMDIX vs. FMDGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMDIX drawdown since its inception was -48.73%, which is greater than FMDGX's maximum drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDIX and FMDGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMDIX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.73% | -38.59% | -10.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.45% | -14.75% | -10.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.45% | -25.30% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.53% | -38.59% | +8.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.03% | -1.09% | -10.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -11.21% | +4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.08% | 5.05% | +7.03% |
Volatility
TMDIX vs. FMDGX - Volatility Comparison
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) at 3.52%. This indicates that TMDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMDIX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 3.52% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.14% | 12.64% | +4.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.56% | 16.46% | +3.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 22.37% | -1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.08% | 24.32% | -3.24% |
TMDIX vs. FMDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMDIX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDGX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMDIX vs. FMDGX - Dividend Comparison
TMDIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 1.77% | 1.85% | 0.47% | 0.63% | 0.81% | 6.43% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMDIX AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.08% | 3.98% | 3.69% | 29.72% | 18.28% | 31.06% | 16.38% | 14.44% | 5.90% | 7.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, TMDIX and FMDGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TMDIX has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to FMDGX (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMDIX dropped -48.73% vs FMDGX's -38.59%.
FMDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMDIX and FMDGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer