TMCGX vs. MMGPX
TMCGX (Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund) and MMGPX (Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TMCGX returned 2.55%/yr vs -4.39%/yr for MMGPX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMCGX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for MMGPX.
Performance
TMCGX vs. MMGPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMCGX achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly higher than MMGPX's 3.01% return.
TMCGX
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 6.68%
- 1Y
- 13.76%
- 3Y*
- 10.34%
- 5Y*
- 2.55%
- 10Y*
- —
MMGPX
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 3.01%
- 6M
- -1.96%
- 1Y
- 1.20%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- -4.39%
- 10Y*
- —
TMCGX vs. MMGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMCGX Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund | 9.82% | 2.48% | 10.20% | 16.94% | -28.27% | 11.39% | 53.73% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 3.01% | 12.58% | 41.83% | 44.34% | -63.37% | -11.55% | 138.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMCGX and MMGPX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020 | 0.81 |
The correlation between TMCGX and MMGPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMCGX vs. MMGPX — Risk / Return Rank
TMCGX
MMGPX
TMCGX vs. MMGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMCGX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.03 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 0.05 | +0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.28 | 0.10 | +3.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMCGX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.05 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | -0.11 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.45 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
TMCGX vs. MMGPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMCGX drawdown since its inception was -39.66%, smaller than the maximum MMGPX drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMCGX and MMGPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMCGX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.66% | -75.38% | +35.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.58% | -27.79% | +13.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.28% | -29.27% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.66% | -72.70% | +33.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.57% | -38.45% | +34.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -30.25% | +14.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 13.13% | -8.71% |
Volatility
TMCGX vs. MMGPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX) is 4.03%, while Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a volatility of 9.53%. This indicates that TMCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMCGX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 9.53% | -5.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.75% | 21.14% | -7.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.03% | 27.77% | -10.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 39.72% | -17.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 35.23% | -11.05% |
TMCGX vs. MMGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMCGX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MMGPX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMCGX vs. MMGPX - Dividend Comparison
TMCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 0.41% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 125.40% | 64.53% | 7.93% | 15.63% | 28.02% |
TMCGX Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.13% | 2.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMCGX and MMGPX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMGPX has higher volatility (9.53%) compared to TMCGX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMCGX dropped -39.66% vs MMGPX's -75.38%.
TMCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMCGX and MMGPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer