PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMC vs. LYSDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TMC vs. LYSDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMC achieves a -34.85% return, which is significantly lower than LYSDY's 36.28% return.


TMC

1D
8.06%
1M
-21.64%
6M
-44.24%
YTD
-34.85%
1Y
-43.06%
3Y*
30.23%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-18.79%

LYSDY

1D
3.58%
1M
-9.84%
6M
8.57%
YTD
36.28%
1Y
68.97%
3Y*
35.70%
5Y*
18.96%
10Y*
68.94%
ALL TIME*
5.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMC vs. LYSDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TMC
TMC the metals company Inc.
-34.85%450.89%1.82%42.86%-62.98%-81.18%
LYSDY
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR
36.28%109.37%-18.22%-8.17%-29.21%47.13%

Correlation

The correlation between TMC and LYSDY is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2021

0.21

The correlation between TMC and LYSDY shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TMC:

$1.74B

LYSDY:

$11.34B

EPS

TMC:

-$0.00

LYSDY:

A$0.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

TMC:

$0.00

LYSDY:

A$1.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TMC:

-$136.00K

LYSDY:

A$301.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

TMC:

-$296.72M

LYSDY:

A$236.57M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMC vs. LYSDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMC
TMC Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
TMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMC Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

LYSDY
LYSDY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
LYSDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYSDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYSDY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
LYSDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYSDY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMC vs. LYSDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMCLYSDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.21

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.66

1.49

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.02

2.98

-4.00

TMC vs. LYSDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMC Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the LYSDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMC and LYSDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMC vs. LYSDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMC drawdown since its inception was -95.58%, roughly equal to the maximum LYSDY drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMC and LYSDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMCLYSDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.58%

-99.93%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.20%

-46.39%

-18.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.20%

-46.39%

-18.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.71%

-59.24%

-8.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.14%

-84.31%

+5.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.18%

23.25%

+18.93%

Volatility

TMC vs. LYSDY - Volatility Comparison

TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC) has a higher volatility of 18.07% compared to Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) at 14.55%. This indicates that TMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYSDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMCLYSDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.07%

14.55%

+3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.74%

42.81%

+20.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

94.13%

64.09%

+30.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

112.37%

50.67%

+61.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

112.37%

278.45%

-166.08%

Dividends

TMC vs. LYSDY - Dividend Comparison

Neither TMC nor LYSDY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TMC vs. LYSDY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TMC the metals company Inc. and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
406.10M
(TMC) Total Revenue
(LYSDY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TMC values in USD, LYSDY values in AUD

Frequently Asked Questions


TMC and LYSDY have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMC has higher volatility (18.07%) compared to LYSDY (14.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMC dropped -95.58% vs LYSDY's -99.93%.

LYSDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMC and LYSDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer