TMC vs. GDXU
TMC (TMC the metals company Inc.) is a stock, while GDXU (MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index. Over the past 3 years, TMC returned 68.25%/yr vs 37.87%/yr for GDXU. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TMC vs. GDXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMC achieves a -11.99% return, which is significantly higher than GDXU's -56.00% return.
TMC
- 1D
- 5.85%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- -11.99%
- 6M
- -18.22%
- 1Y
- 13.12%
- 3Y*
- 68.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXU
- 1D
- 8.84%
- 1M
- -50.11%
- YTD
- -56.00%
- 6M
- -55.92%
- 1Y
- 30.95%
- 3Y*
- 37.87%
- 5Y*
- -14.73%
- 10Y*
- —
TMC vs. GDXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMC TMC the metals company Inc. | -11.99% | 450.89% | 1.82% | 42.86% | -62.98% | -81.18% |
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 | -56.00% | 796.47% | -18.60% | -21.36% | -62.82% | -3.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMC and GDXU is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2021 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMC vs. GDXU — Risk / Return Rank
TMC
GDXU
TMC vs. GDXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMC | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.18 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 0.37 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.35 | 0.80 | -0.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMC vs. GDXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMC drawdown since its inception was -95.58%, roughly equal to the maximum GDXU drawdown of -94.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMC and GDXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMC | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.58% | -94.39% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.65% | -83.97% | +22.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.56% | -83.97% | +9.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -92.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.39% | -79.58% | +23.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.43% | -69.77% | -9.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.93% | 38.59% | -0.66% |
Volatility
TMC vs. GDXU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TMC the metals company Inc. (TMC) is 24.27%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a volatility of 54.28%. This indicates that TMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMC | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.27% | 54.28% | -30.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.29% | 123.72% | -55.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.72% | 142.00% | -37.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.21% | 111.92% | +1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 113.21% | 110.82% | +2.39% |
Dividends
TMC vs. GDXU - Dividend Comparison
Neither TMC nor GDXU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TMC and GDXU have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXU has higher volatility (54.28%) compared to TMC (24.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMC dropped -95.58% vs GDXU's -94.39%.
GDXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMC and GDXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer