TMB vs. MULT
TMB (Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF) and MULT (Franklin Multisector Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMB charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for MULT.
Performance
TMB vs. MULT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMB
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULT
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMB vs. MULT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.34% |
MULT Franklin Multisector Income ETF | 0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMB and MULT is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMB vs. MULT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB) and Franklin Multisector Income ETF (MULT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMB | MULT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.77 | 1.40 | +4.36 |
Drawdowns
TMB vs. MULT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMB drawdown since its inception was -0.24%, smaller than the maximum MULT drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMB and MULT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMB | MULT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -1.70% | +1.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.37% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -0.31% | +0.25% |
Volatility
TMB vs. MULT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMB | MULT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46% | 2.94% | -0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.46% | 2.94% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.46% | 2.94% | -0.48% |
TMB vs. MULT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMB has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than MULT's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMB vs. MULT - Dividend Comparison
TMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than MULT's 3.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MULT Franklin Multisector Income ETF | 3.40% | 1.56% |
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMB and MULT have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MULT is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MULT is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMB.
MULT has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 0.36% for TMB.
They also come from different issuers: Thornburg and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMB and 0.39% for MULT.
Find the right allocation for TMB and MULT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer