TMB vs. HARD

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

TMB (Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF) and HARD (Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMB is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Thornburg, while HARD is a Commodities fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. TMB charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HARD.

Performance

TMB vs. HARD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB) and Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (HARD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TMB

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HARD

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -13.57%
• YTD: 2.13%
• 6M: 0.93%
• 1Y: 9.29%
• 3Y*: 9.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMB vs. HARD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF	0.68%
HARD Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF	-13.57%

Correlation

The correlation between TMB and HARD is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.16

Return for Risk

TMB vs. HARD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HARD

HARD Risk / Return Rank: 14
HARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
HARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
HARD Omega Ratio Rank: 14
HARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
HARD Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMB vs. HARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB) and Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (HARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMB	HARD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.36	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.63	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.08	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.46	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.45	—

Drawdowns

TMB vs. HARD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMB drawdown since its inception was -0.59%, smaller than the maximum HARD drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMB and HARD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMB	HARD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.59%	-20.28%	+19.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-20.28%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-20.28%	+20.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.17%	-5.64%	+5.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.43%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TMB	HARD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.08%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.93%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.52%	26.35%	-22.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.52%	19.06%	-15.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.52%	19.06%	-15.54%

TMB vs. HARD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMB has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than HARD's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMB vs. HARD - Dividend Comparison

TMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than HARD's 2.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HARD Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF	2.93%	2.36%	3.51%	1.95%
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMB and HARD in my portfolio?

TMB and HARD have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TMB or HARD?

On fees, TMB is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMB or HARD?

TMB is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HARD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMB or HARD?

HARD has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 0.36% for TMB.

What is the main difference between TMB and HARD?

TMB is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while HARD is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Thornburg and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMB and 0.75% for HARD.