TMB vs. CRDT
TMB (Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF) and CRDT (Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMB charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CRDT.
Performance
TMB vs. CRDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMB
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRDT
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 0.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMB vs. CRDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.68% |
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMB and CRDT is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMB vs. CRDT — Risk / Return Rank
TMB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRDT
TMB vs. CRDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB) and Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMB | CRDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.01 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.04 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.11 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMB vs. CRDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMB drawdown since its inception was -0.59%, smaller than the maximum CRDT drawdown of -9.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMB and CRDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMB | CRDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -9.80% | +9.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -3.35% | +3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -2.32% | +2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.45% | — |
Volatility
TMB vs. CRDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMB | CRDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52% | 9.51% | -5.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.52% | 7.31% | -3.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.52% | 7.31% | -3.79% |
TMB vs. CRDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMB has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CRDT's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMB vs. CRDT - Dividend Comparison
TMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than CRDT's 6.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDT Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF | 6.34% | 7.04% | 7.29% | 2.59% |
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMB and CRDT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRDT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRDT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMB.
CRDT has the higher dividend yield at 6.34%, compared with 0.36% for TMB.
They also come from different issuers: Thornburg and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMB and 0.50% for CRDT.
Find the right allocation for TMB and CRDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer