TMB vs. AINP
TMB (Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF) and AINP (Allspring Income Plus ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMB charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AINP.
Performance
TMB vs. AINP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMB
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AINP
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- 5.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMB vs. AINP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.22% |
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMB and AINP is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMB vs. AINP — Risk / Return Rank
TMB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AINP
TMB vs. AINP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB) and Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMB | AINP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.34 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.56 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMB vs. AINP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMB drawdown since its inception was -0.59%, smaller than the maximum AINP drawdown of -2.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMB and AINP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMB | AINP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -2.61% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -0.41% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -0.46% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.61% | — |
Volatility
TMB vs. AINP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMB | AINP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53% | 3.32% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.53% | 3.62% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.53% | 3.62% | -0.09% |
TMB vs. AINP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMB has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than AINP's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMB vs. AINP - Dividend Comparison
TMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than AINP's 5.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF | 5.77% | 5.03% | 0.47% |
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMB and AINP have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AINP is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AINP is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMB.
AINP has the higher dividend yield at 5.77%, compared with 0.36% for TMB.
They also come from different issuers: Thornburg and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMB and 0.36% for AINP.
Find the right allocation for TMB and AINP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer