TMAYX vs. PTSGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y (TMAYX) and Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund (PTSGX).
TMAYX is an actively managed fund by Touchstone. It was launched on Aug 31, 2015. PTSGX is managed by Touchstone. It was launched on Aug 11, 2000.
Performance
TMAYX vs. PTSGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMAYX vs. PTSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMAYX Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y | -0.58% | 6.15% | 8.27% | 13.25% | -8.54% | 9.47% | 4.72% | 12.39% | -2.47% | 0.31% |
PTSGX Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund | -17.27% | 15.27% | 23.79% | 51.60% | -50.56% | 3.76% | 68.92% | 67.10% | 5.80% | 34.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMAYX achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly higher than PTSGX's -17.27% return. Over the past 10 years, TMAYX has underperformed PTSGX with an annualized return of 4.39%, while PTSGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.95% annualized return.
TMAYX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 5.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.97%
- 5Y*
- 4.71%
- 10Y*
- 4.39%
PTSGX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -9.70%
- YTD
- -17.27%
- 6M
- -22.20%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- 15.00%
- 5Y*
- -1.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMAYX vs. PTSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMAYX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than PTSGX's 1.16% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMAYX vs. PTSGX — Risk / Return Rank
TMAYX
PTSGX
TMAYX vs. PTSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y (TMAYX) and Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund (PTSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMAYX | PTSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | 0.17 | +1.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.23 | 0.43 | +1.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.06 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 0.06 | +1.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | 0.17 | +7.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMAYX | PTSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 0.17 | +1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | -0.04 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.48 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.34 | +0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMAYX and PTSGX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TMAYX vs. PTSGX - Dividend Comparison
TMAYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, more than PTSGX's 0.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMAYX Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y | 7.89% | 7.25% | 7.82% | 7.91% | 6.25% | 6.37% | 6.43% | 3.81% | 2.18% | 4.47% | 2.86% | 1.81% |
PTSGX Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund | 0.79% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.67% | 10.05% | 39.46% | 34.95% | 24.32% | 16.89% | 9.33% |
Drawdowns
TMAYX vs. PTSGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMAYX drawdown since its inception was -21.44%, smaller than the maximum PTSGX drawdown of -60.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAYX and PTSGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMAYX | PTSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.44% | -60.33% | +38.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | -24.16% | +20.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.66% | -60.07% | +46.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.44% | -60.07% | +38.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -24.61% | +22.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.13% | -15.86% | +13.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 8.36% | -7.69% |
Volatility
TMAYX vs. PTSGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y (TMAYX) is 1.03%, while Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund (PTSGX) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that TMAYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMAYX | PTSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 6.72% | -5.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.90% | 15.92% | -14.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.40% | 26.06% | -22.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.67% | 30.99% | -26.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 28.90% | -23.86% |