PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMAYX vs. PTSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMAYX vs. PTSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y (TMAYX) and Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund (PTSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMAYX achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than PTSGX's 7.01% return. Over the past 10 years, TMAYX has underperformed PTSGX with an annualized return of 4.53%, while PTSGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.68% annualized return.


TMAYX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.48%
YTD
1.65%
6M
1.71%
1Y
5.98%
3Y*
8.45%
5Y*
4.75%
10Y*
4.53%

PTSGX

1D
-0.67%
1M
7.36%
YTD
7.01%
6M
6.40%
1Y
12.93%
3Y*
21.65%
5Y*
3.91%
10Y*
16.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMAYX vs. PTSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMAYX
Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y
1.65%6.15%8.27%13.25%-8.54%9.47%4.72%12.39%-2.47%0.31%
PTSGX
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund
7.01%15.27%23.79%51.60%-50.56%3.76%68.92%67.10%5.80%34.42%

Correlation

The correlation between TMAYX and PTSGX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2013

0.39

The correlation between TMAYX and PTSGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (10 years) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMAYX vs. PTSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMAYX
TMAYX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TMAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TMAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

PTSGX
PTSGX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PTSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PTSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMAYX vs. PTSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y (TMAYX) and Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund (PTSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMAYXPTSGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.13

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

0.57

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.94

1.46

+11.48

TMAYX vs. PTSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMAYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the PTSGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMAYX and PTSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMAYXPTSGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

0.68

+1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.13

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.58

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.38

+0.48

Drawdowns

TMAYX vs. PTSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMAYX drawdown since its inception was -21.44%, smaller than the maximum PTSGX drawdown of -60.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAYX and PTSGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMAYXPTSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.44%

-60.33%

+38.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-24.16%

+22.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.36%

-28.56%

+24.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.66%

-60.07%

+46.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.44%

-60.07%

+38.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.48%

+2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-15.82%

+13.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

9.39%

-8.91%

Volatility

TMAYX vs. PTSGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y (TMAYX) is 0.76%, while Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund (PTSGX) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that TMAYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMAYXPTSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

4.65%

-3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

15.59%

-13.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59%

20.39%

-17.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.70%

30.88%

-26.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.06%

28.97%

-23.91%

TMAYX vs. PTSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMAYX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than PTSGX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMAYX vs. PTSGX - Dividend Comparison

TMAYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.72%, more than PTSGX's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTSGX
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund
0.61%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%12.67%10.05%39.46%34.95%24.32%16.89%9.33%
TMAYX
Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y
7.72%7.25%7.82%7.91%6.25%6.37%6.43%3.81%2.18%4.47%2.86%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMAYX and PTSGX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTSGX has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to TMAYX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMAYX dropped -21.44% vs PTSGX's -60.33%.

TMAYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMAYX and PTSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer