TMAYX vs. LSYAX
TMAYX (Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y) and LSYAX (Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. TMAYX is actively managed, while LSYAX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TMAYX returned 4.54%/yr vs 4.25%/yr for LSYAX. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TMAYX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LSYAX.
Performance
TMAYX vs. LSYAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMAYX achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than LSYAX's 1.63% return.
TMAYX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- 3.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.26%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 4.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.93%
LSYAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 1Y
- 5.24%
- 3Y*
- 7.64%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TMAYX vs. LSYAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMAYX Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y | 1.34% | 6.15% | 8.27% | 13.25% | -8.54% | 9.47% | 21.31% |
LSYAX Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund | 1.63% | 7.50% | 8.46% | 10.60% | -7.21% | 4.50% | 14.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMAYX and LSYAX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2020 | 0.78 |
The correlation between TMAYX and LSYAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMAYX vs. LSYAX — Risk / Return Rank
TMAYX
LSYAX
TMAYX vs. LSYAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y (TMAYX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMAYX | LSYAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.33 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 1.82 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.38 | 8.29 | -1.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMAYX vs. LSYAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMAYX drawdown since its inception was -21.44%, which is greater than LSYAX's maximum drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAYX and LSYAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMAYX | LSYAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.44% | -10.79% | -10.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.02% | -2.84% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.36% | -5.30% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.66% | -10.79% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -1.03% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.08% | -1.82% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 0.62% | -0.12% |
Volatility
TMAYX vs. LSYAX - Volatility Comparison
Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y (TMAYX) has a higher volatility of 0.58% compared to Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund (LSYAX) at 0.51%. This indicates that TMAYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSYAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMAYX | LSYAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.58% | 0.51% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.00% | 2.88% | -0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62% | 3.56% | -0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.69% | 4.30% | +0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.05% | 4.17% | +0.88% |
TMAYX vs. LSYAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMAYX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than LSYAX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMAYX vs. LSYAX - Dividend Comparison
TMAYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, more than LSYAX's 7.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSYAX Lord Abbett Short Duration High Yield Fund | 7.29% | 7.91% | 8.01% | 6.38% | 4.86% | 5.77% | 4.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMAYX Touchstone Ares Credit Opportunities Fund Class Y | 7.74% | 7.25% | 7.82% | 7.91% | 6.25% | 6.37% | 6.43% | 3.81% | 2.18% | 4.47% | 2.86% | 1.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMAYX and LSYAX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMAYX has higher volatility (0.58%) compared to LSYAX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMAYX dropped -21.44% vs LSYAX's -10.79%.
LSYAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMAYX and LSYAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer