PTSGX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund (PTSGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
PTSGX is managed by Touchstone. It was launched on Aug 11, 2000. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
PTSGX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PTSGX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTSGX Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund | -13.47% | 15.27% | 23.79% | 51.60% | -50.56% | 3.76% | 68.92% | 67.10% | 5.80% | 34.42% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTSGX achieves a -13.47% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's -9.73% return. Over the past 10 years, PTSGX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 14.46%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.
PTSGX
- 1D
- 4.60%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- -13.47%
- 6M
- -18.62%
- 1Y
- 8.98%
- 3Y*
- 16.73%
- 5Y*
- -0.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.46%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PTSGX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTSGX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PTSGX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
PTSGX
SCHG
PTSGX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund (PTSGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTSGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 0.76 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.73 | 1.24 | -0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.17 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 1.09 | -0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | 3.71 | -2.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTSGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 0.76 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.57 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.79 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.79 | -0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between PTSGX and SCHG is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PTSGX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
PTSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTSGX Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund | 0.76% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.67% | 10.05% | 39.46% | 34.95% | 24.32% | 16.89% | 9.33% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
PTSGX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTSGX drawdown since its inception was -60.33%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTSGX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTSGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.33% | -34.59% | -25.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.16% | -16.41% | -7.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.07% | -34.59% | -25.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.07% | -34.59% | -25.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.14% | -12.51% | -8.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.86% | -5.22% | -10.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.46% | 4.84% | +3.62% |
Volatility
PTSGX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund (PTSGX) has a higher volatility of 8.33% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.77%. This indicates that PTSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PTSGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.33% | 6.77% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.53% | 12.54% | +3.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.41% | 22.45% | +3.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.03% | 22.31% | +8.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.94% | 21.51% | +7.43% |